It would encourge more cooperation IMO

If Hillary was a VP it would get seriously awkward.

Because the pissy fits congress has done is embarassing.

Did someone say killary cliton

Encourage people to work together again.

>making Clinton the VP

One-party system > Two-party system in theory

That's a terrible idea

A horrible idea

And if you fear assassinations you can include a clause that has the Pres naming a different successor.

Absoultely terrible

Thats what I'm sayin

You do understand conservatism means less govt = better right? @Bueller

Losers being the VP was a law at some point.

BUT THE CLAUSE IN THE CONSTITUTION FOR THAT SAYS THAT THE VP BECOMES PRES AFTER AN ASSASSINATION

:REE:

That nothing happening as long as regulations are removed = good correct?

<:ree:356316447548375070>

loser being vp my ass

The phrase does, the party doesn't

as someone who doesn't celebrate Halloween, how are adults participating in Halloween?

@ErnieLanders That description could work for Fusion Conservatism the best

I would think

neither the GOP nor the Dems actually stick to what they back.

@Rev good, seems pretty spooky though

@ErnieLanders https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusionism

ideology of Frank Meyer

i eat chicken and watermelon everyday

@Deleted User d0e93084 everyone gets a medal! 1st place, 2nd place, 250th place!

former Commie made an ideology that's a mix of Right-Libertarianism, Traditionalism and Social Conservatism @ErnieLanders

funnily enough

well he was an ex-Commie when he made it

Yea bringing back a previous part of the US constitution....is a socialist idea

I only want 1 thing from the trump administration. Not healthcare, not lower taxes, but privatized social security.

@Bueller I got a question though, why do you want to create diversity for the sake of having diversity when you know it caused conflicts and will continue to do so?

If trump can privatize social security, it would save this country

I want 1 thing from Trump and that's destroying north korea

The Nation was founded on Liberal principles by some of the founders

Schmekel the founders wrote it....

but by those standards it would be Conservative

Now