Message from @mew is not illegal
Discord ID: 374419040401096704
Anything that would improve the experience of you, the user, here on the right server
holy death in here
@Ragnar_Den_Ruda i think we may be trialling them soon, they have been much suggested and discussed
@Bloodywasher FFA in what regards, like 0 moderation?
no lol like
the old autism channel idk its kind of like the voice lobbies but... you should expect retardation.
No one is on voice and its makin me real sad
is this some devils night shit>
That is excellent news then trent!
yeah true that, i will bring it up with the staff dude
also
im doing homework rn
<:pepothump:359919056725344257>
otherwise i would be in vc
I am busy crying
@trent Will the ideological roles be limited to the right wing? I notice the rules stipulate that individuals with leftist inclinations are allowed as long as they conduct themselves in a civil manner; therefore I imagine it's worth including all major titles.
im not too sure dude, yeah we allow leftists as long as their civil so we may have them available too but at this stage im not sure sorry
Epistomological philosophy ideologies seem very useful to include as well. Such as Pragmatism.
give owner
@Ragnar_Den_Ruda u seem way too serious for this server stop that
@amygdala Hi ❤️
Hi
wow look
2 traps
fr*ckin degens
:(
dilating what
WHO THE FUCK IS DIALITING
that shit is disgusting
stop it at once
what the
holy frick
my bro @xX NegroSaki Samurai Xx dropping hella knowledge bombs in <#363104072363933718>
damn
Jews control everything
Who would have thought
@mew is not illegal I suppose the themes of what i've said don't belong outside serious chat. To be fair though trent is the one who incited me to discourse the idea of ideological role inclusion.
Teleportation
@xX NegroSaki Samurai Xx The information you're sharing is far too broad in scope. It comes off as if you're just listing every ***Secondary*** source that affirms your egocentric bias. Adress concepts in a manageable scope. Give commentary to the sources significance in proving a thesis, and attribute mainly Primary sources.
no