lul

all bottlenecked by one memory controller per 2 cores, making two cores peforming at 75% of their theoretical max

i wouldnt know tbh ive always had intel processors this is my first amd

sure, good enough, but not good for the money

ryzen is the only good amd processor

ever lol

would've been great if you got like a ryzen 1400 or even 1500

im not worried about it, it'll run ark which is all i need it for tbh

i was too lazy to read up on the amd jargon

im still an intel man

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/kgPVM8

i just shit that out real quick

and its still better and lower cost

like so much better rip

i trust the ibuypower niggers tho

You trust them?

my guy

theyre good kikes

they gave you a 2012 cpu

eh

well, you do have a point

good enough to make a profit off

no one cares

cool

return dat shit @SchloppyDoggo smh

>accepting the fact they are giving you a 5 year old processor

no product named FX has ever been good

not compatible with AM3+

gtg but lol he got scammed

rip

rip

actually not a 100x

maybe 100%

:)

1500x is 55% better than the FX 6300

The first computer that I ever built has been based on AM3. Starting tomorrow, I begin a year worth of savings so I can build an AM4 computer.

it was good at the time

in 2012, honestly it was competitive, but amd didn't push for a new architecture soon enouigh

I built it in 2014. And frankly, it was a nice upgrade when I got it, just like the prebuilts and the laptop before it.

Unlike those computers, this one is still halfway decent. I have to turn down the settings on my high-end games, but it's half decent.

I've built plenty of computers, honestly not that many amd systems, only two in my living. I work specifically with asrock and ASUS boards. My first amd system was in 2015, and it had an 8320 in it, second system was a Ryzen 1600. The 1600 was easy to work through, easy overclocking, just plain good. But I work mostly with xeons and HEDT stuff, so.