I'm also busy

A capitalist is a person who receives most of his income from the labor of others, from owning capital.

Capital is just another word for work done.

Those who worship capital care not fir its source nor its sustainability.

Responsible capital farming techniques in use since the Roman times are one of many ways to ensue that it can ve made available, both now and in the future.

Search "Capital Order Sustainability Trust" for more details.

Ok i have to admit this was just a play on one of those fairtrade produce types of advertisements

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/396703734400286720/502715372261081099/image0-7.png

Capital in the Marxist sense refers to a means of production which is property that is used to produce something

pizza time

pizza time

I like garlic

Ew

Jk

Garlic is good

But I don't like garlic bread

No

Heck Painkiller

I mean real garlic

@Weissest what jew bot?

I love Jews 😍

@👻S🅱ooccy👻your awesome

Thancc

@👻S🅱ooccy👻pls join VC

Isn't regulated market actually leads to monopoly.

I think it depends

Most often, the issues with an economic system lies in the people in charge rather than the structure itself

@OOFgouf Well, market is a competition and you can win in it. As you can see the companies only become bigger. Capital accumulates.

I don't really care about winning it

I want a society that can hold itself up

There would be monopolies in the US if not the anti-monopoly laws.

@OOFgouf The only way capitalism would work properly (including Fascism) is by denying profit as a main goal. But it can't happen.

Egalitarianism is anti-science

😤

@Kfish It's the only way to develop properly. The privileges and lack of social elevators (sometimes even the institution of inheritance) prevent talented people from starting to bring benefits to society.

@Kfish In the Russian Empire there were almost no scientists who had left the peasantry. But in the USSR with a free education - a huge number of peasants became scientists and advanced science.

For example.

@YMHUK42 That would be meritocracy though. Pure egalitarianism throughout is anti-science

Obviously the USSR wasnt gonna accept downies that try to become scientists

@Kfish Communism does not declare that people are biologically equal.