Message from Outboarduniform in The Right Server #serious
plutarch identifed more with north africans than he did with the savage barbarians up north
they certainly had the capacity to exist since there were Africans in Europe at the time
Well it was formed to a degree but they didn't unify as much as we like to cliam now
Mostly from WW1
French Foreign Legion
Again. a major church figure during the roman empire was half sub saharan african...
@agag how many Africans were there in Europe in the early 20th century. Less than 1%?
Isn't it still that low?
sure it wasn't nearly as high today
lol yeah it's 1%
i just googled it
but you were saying the Roman Empire wasn't even civnat
rome is pretty much the definition of civnat
look at how far reaching their ability to assimilate was
l did not say Rome wasn't civnat
you said they did not permit filthy Africans to roam the streets
was that not about Rome
Rome is literally the argument against ethnostates
Also I believe he was referring to Mussolini’s Italy when he said that @agag
It’s still flawed though
l said that Mussolini sought to revive the days of the Roman empire, and to do that, a militaristic dictatorship had to be formed
No you did not
You didn't make that clear but fair enough
I don't know enough of Mussolini's italy to comment
when did you say anything about militaristic dictatorship
You just said "l did not say Rome wasn't civnat"
But what's your point?
No USA was pointing out your flaws in thinking where you said that Rome wasn’t civnat
Not even my argument
It doesn't even matter
It just wasn't an ethnostate
or even close to one.