that's a good dog

who are you bluepilling @Lockmarth

@PainSeeker5 because they had to divert resources away from GS programs because of the war

socialism

mixed economy change my mind

ok

as a whole

it was also a distraction

@Living The Dream 🍀 yes redpilled

eh

maybe

we agree on something <:GWragMonkaS:390321742624849920>

this is progress

who

So you think that if they had thrown *more* money into Great Society programs, it would have solved poverty @agag

And you shit on socialists

you are looking very twofaced right now

usa's main belief: Throw money and government at all problems and they'll go away

every man a king

@Living The Dream 🍀 only king is God

<:FeelsDabMan:356316778470834176>

king is god

nice

@Living The Dream 🍀 pepe is a hate symbol

lf l had a dime for every democrat that said "if only we had more money for muh poverty"...

@PainSeeker5 i serve for God

@Mord you'd solve poverty

come on that was good

i like how google says the definition of socialism is "the collective ownership of bullshit" instead of calling it what it actually is (government ownership)

subversiveness level over 100

lol pepe

Google is not reliable

i should use others

@Mord it's not just that they couldn't throw more money at it, it was also that entering the war caused pro-Great Society democrats to lose lots of seats in favor of Dixiecrats and Republicans

<:wesmart:359946049588166657> usa has a lower life span then Europe because we have more blacks

You can throw all the money you want at poverty, hell give everyone who's in poverty a million dollars, that won't bring them out of poverty. They will spend it on material things. ALL that money would be gone within a year and spent on bullshit.

@Living The Dream 🍀 damn really eye opening

people who are drop dead poor usually mismanage their finances terribly

@PainSeeker5 it's true i swear

aren't there a lot of homeless alcoholics as well?