Monarchy/=Tyranny
Democracy=Tyranny

This is the cycle, and it is eternal.

What about both

You do realise the US is a republic not a direct democracy?

Constitutional Representative Republic*

Electoral college prevents tyranny of the majority that comes from democracy

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/487036344791597085/501363778202370048/RFUJPmSCFd3PHsj6skyQY-Upi4Q3iQRwKPvmNVZcnYk.png

Monarchy is retarded

The electoral college doesn't vote against the people, even when it's in their best interest.

Why

you have to rely on hereditary values only

Democracy is retarded

Thats not an argument against monarchy being retarded

Pure democracy is retarded

You have to rely on everyone, even those completely incompetent, to make a proper choice based off of values and not their wants

monarchy is rart

Representative Democracy is no better if the Representatives are absolute shite.

Relying on one person to align with your values is no different
and a monarch is far harder to remove and stays in power for life

Monarchy is no better if the monarch is absolute shite

A monarch typically has more on the line. His legacy is the success of the nation, and he has been raised to make it succeed. When in an inter period of social transference to a new system, a monarchy makes more sense than the whim of the people or the whim of a the representatives.

I don't like monarchies for the sake of monarchies, I like monarchies to achieve end goals more in line with the original values.

You have an entire history of mad kings and tyrants to look back on as evidence of your folly

Hi people

hi

<:GWnanamiRokaNaisu:398860628476952576>

Relying on the lowest common denominator to pick the people with power

You have a history of tyrants in democratic states too lol

You have an entire history of empires and successful kings. You also have a history of ruined Democracies or representative Democracies.

Your point is?

>Sometimes things fail

There is no president that has ever lived who even rivals the most mild of europeans tyrants
Even if they were on par the length of suffering would be at 4 years

KEK

4 years is a better span of time to endure a failure than a lifespan

The world doesn’t revolve around the US

Absolute monarchy or consitututional monarchy?

Most kings didn't live a lifetime of rule, and most US presidents haven't achieved what kings do.

Plus it was pretty shit depending who you were

This is all just wild assumption

Like during the Indians wars

I'll just hope my tyrant king dies within the next 60 years