Message from @Nerea
Discord ID: 501749574105432074
@Quasi Okay buddy
@Quasi I do acknowledge that Christianity is philosophical, however as i said, you simply can't comprehend my point of view because you DO believe in god, so it's impossible for you to think of it as a human creation.
<:FeelsFedora:356316725865611264>
Epic style
<:GWnanamiPepeEZ:398860718088257536>
yo yo i love these mods they are cool they are epic
I deleted 73gb of shit all at once and my phone imploded
but who kicked me?
@Xenoframe this happens to me at least once a day
lol
@Noxar I can ''comprehend'' your worldview, but do not take me for some kind of fideist. Nor do I use weak arguments such as Aquinas's 5 ''proofs''. Again, how do you justify Traditionalism in your worldview?
that's why I hate androids tbh
Not just ethically, let's expand it since whenever you make a statement there are also metaphysical and epistemological presuppositions
Android better than iPhone
We watching John Oliver in class rn
I'm planning to sell my current note 8 and get the xs max.
Wtf
@Quasi Every society that was ever succesful was traditionalist and we can see at the very moment how rejection of traditionalism is destroying our civilisation. That alone is enough observable empirical evidence to accept the neccesity that is traditionalism
my last iPhone was a iPhone 7 and I hated to see it go
You don't need to ponder any deep philosophy to understand this simple concept
neither do you need to believe in the existence of supernatural authority
(but its ok if you do)
` Every society that was ever succesful was traditionalist and we can see at the very moment how rejection of traditionalism is destroying our civilisation.`
This is a vague statement. What is ''success''? Different nations have different traditions, some we would call degenerate.
`You don't need to ponder any deep philosophy to understand this simple concept`
You do, because you have tons of presuppositions.
From red to blue so quick
`That alone is enough observable empirical evidence to accept the neccesity that is traditionalism`
Empiricism? Can you verify that you can verify your empirical evidence?
@Quasi Do you also believe that murder can't be considered morally wrong without religion?
@Leiro レイロ yes, but im not talking to you
<:FeelsDabMan:356316778470834176>
ik
@Quasi If religion was the only thing keeping us from killing each other, then no animal species would ever survive including humans
To not kill your own is a natural instinct
The idea that only religion keeps us from murdering is thus wrong
To not murder is not a result of religion, Religion merely embraces this instinct on philosophical level
and presents the divine as additional justification
thus