I can record every post you made

and post it here

you literally said *this is about national socialism*

like

this was a debate on economics

TRS and its users do not support the evil Nazi Regime of National Socialist Germany

which you failed when your response to my first argument was basically capitalist propaganda that the freer the markets the easier it is for people to buy what they want and innovation rises

when you are contradicted in your bullshit you just don't respond

do your dialogue trees not have updates or something?

reminder that innovation comes about when you place arbitrary restrictions on things

Wait I think I know why Rett is such a retard

@Tohryn please address the pareto optimization trade problem first

there are so many retarded cool guns that exist because of the assault weapons ban

@Tohryn how much do you deadlift

none of them are good!

then we can move onto the ns stuff if you want

"@Rett Kevinaugh It was superior in virtually every way"
"@Rett Kevinaugh NS worked very well in practice"
"you're straw manning we are talking about NS"

but they are still innovations

but initially it was me showing you why the free market propaganda is incorrect

@Tohryn you started ignoring my evidence

a solid 22 @☦ Slouch ☦

and started engaging with the commie to avoid my points

Lel

from 1933-38 GNP grew by 9.5% per year, industrial output by 17%, and private consumption by 6.3%, and real wages increased by 21%, and per capita income by 40%

There's your problem

you ignored this entirely

Your dyel

just didn't address it at all

No

as well as the 0.3% unemployment rate post

Economy is gay, send tweet

Only mods

I can't post images wtf

please address the first part though

I will repost it

Economy is unironically the last thing you should ever worry about

Its pretty easy to make considerable strides economically when it costs several million dollars for a loaf of bread

@Tohryn Ok, so when you run an aggregate pareto optimality function for large sets of people in an open economy with firms competing, everytime you will end up with several firms outcompeting consistently and becoming oligopolies and close to monopolies. The theory here is that they effectively drive the overall demand for the market, and thus this collusion drives the pareto optimal function entirely in the favor of the large firms. A strong state however which had absolute power over corporations could induce trade limitations and wage/standard laws which do not drive down pareto optimality and preserve market competition.