i cant even look at ebonics without vomiting all over myself

I'm a big bad mamma jamma

<:Ban:401801523207864331> <:Ban:401801523207864331> <:Ban:401801523207864331> <:Ban:401801523207864331>

Listen here girly

I am big sexy man

<:Ban:401801523207864331>

you want this nigga dick I know it gurl

oh shit

@Vril-Gesellschaft https://gsis.korea.ac.kr/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/9-2-3-Moonsung-Kang.pdf

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Added Cuckold to Successful Black Man#4755***

Where?

Rekt

SHow me

@/pol/tard look your besty

The problem is we can't compare the growth in GDP if we allowed the market to operate freely.

@WizardLizardInABlizzard fugg off

We can't go back in time and erase progress and run the experiment again.

@Kierketard if it's not there just dig for it

cursed image

This is conjecture but I think America's GDP would have grown massively over the last 50 years. Subsidizing tech or not.

you're not really right wing unless you suck toes

ideally I'd have uni access to library but I no longer have it because I am not a student anymore

if you're a student you should use your library services

send feet

Why am I researching your argument exactly?

Kierketard you can agree with his argument without agreeing to the conclusion

jesus here you go kierke

that wasn't hard to find

wtf i love merkel now

gross

because it's an obscure set of data that I couldn't get to you in a few minutes anyways, your expectations are faulty, and so you can directly in your own see that minarchism is incorrect

why

I mean his argument is pretty solid conceptually (and I believe his sources are prob correct)

the pdf might not have the numbers

I assumed it would

perhaps hastily

@agag He's referencing the 1950s now and long term growth

sugma

@Vril-Gesellschaft is it the Subsidy Policy of China... one?