There's a guy in this other chat who claims that hillary would of been better and Trump has barely gone through with his promises.

np, I just think the topic of forming a new technology fascinating

He's from Sweden so I don't expect him to be to educated on this but still.

He's annoying as shit.

>goes to war with Russia and starts Nuclear Holocaust

They'd still say Hilary was better

in that scenario

Pretty much

At this point, if anything goes wrong in the U.S it's trumps fault.

Because YOU CAN'T ENFORCE A NO FLY ZONE IN OTHER COUNTRY'S TERRITORY WITHOUT BEING AT WAR

Hurricane Michael: Because Trump doesn't believe in science

Russia would defeat the US in war btw

fat hedonistic Americans would get rekt pretty hard

@Vril-Gesellschaft no

Wtf

yes

Have you compared

Depends how the war is fought.

they also have higher nuclear capability

Russia would probably drain the US's will to fight

Both nation's

and they'd only need to hit yellowstone

to destroy everything

If the war is fought via nuclear weapons, the Russians obviously outrank the U.S

The lazy population nowadays has no motivation, and the war is moved by the people

*no

with no nukes they would win too

Dude USA spends more then 600 billion dollars more on military

most of the US is fat hedonistic and lazy

the russians are poor and their military is better trained

But I don't think they'd immediately go to nuclear weapons, seeing that if one launches, everyone launches.

poor people make better more determined soldiers

Putin is not a dumb guy

In conventional warfare I think the U.S would have the upper hand.

no it wouldn't lol

He wouldn't start a nuclear holocaust

the military itself says it is in a crisis

russia would never beat the united states if they attacked us

too many fat people

0 chance

t.jew