@agag Some arguments to counter the claims that these Church Fathers supported the doctrine of Papal Supremacy.
- The church at Rome was founded (or more formally organised) by both Peter and Paul. As no particular charism or primacy attaches to Paul, then it is not from his co-foundation of the church of Rome that the Roman Pontiff claims primacy.
- Rome is an Apostolic throne, not the Apostolic throne.
- Church Fathers do not refer to another tier or clerical office above the ordinary episcopate.
- Meletius of Antioch, who presided over the Second Ecumenical Council, was not in communion with Rome.
- Galatians 2:7 points to equality of both St. Peter and St. Paul
- Cyril of Alexandria states "One therefore is Christ both Son and Lord, not as if a man had attained only such a conjunction with God as consists in a unity of dignity alone or of authority. For it is not equality of honour which unites natures; for then Peter and John, who were of equal honour with each other, being both Apostles and holy disciples."
- 1 Peter 1:4-5, Peter refers to himself as a fellow elder, not as THE elder, but a fellow one
