better quality ?

or just give the link

@Derek Nelson ofc nasa is a source, so?

There’s nothing wrong with the picture I showed, that has the link in it.

its just the definition of a flat model isnt it?

No. It’s a definition of a linear aircraft.

defining something doesnt mean claiming its true:c

or what do i miss here

I like you @questionmark

Why are equations nasa gives based on a flat non-rotating earth?

Sigh

oh the same false proof again

assumptions for simplicity are not proof

Why don’t you actually read it?

I already know what is says

okay so nasa made public a PRIVATE document that the eart is flat..

Why would you have to assume a flat nonrotating earth, if earth is a spinning sphere?

oh true that king

i mean, why would nasa do this

I wonder why Nasa is still in operation after spilling the beans about FE

did you hacked the nasa?

maybe you did it

who knows

maybe you work there

Because people like you still believe they go to space. That’s why.

because the dustances are so short, the spin and curve are negligible

A 1,000 mph spin of earth is negligible?

sometimes

Right..

all goverments of the world, all people who work with rockets, satelites, the internet..they are all lying?

and no one is snitching?

No.

I’ve spoken to a person who builds satellites.

only because you go off ground a few miles doesn't mean earth's spin doesn't affect you

It’s compartmentalized. On a need to know basis.

He thought the satellites he worked on were being launched to space.

Not knowing they are being lifted by balloons.

High-altitude balloons.

Guys i have a question