I can't find it though because I lack the methods to do so. My wife is much more knowledgeable than me on law as it's her domain of work and thus I have no issues finding stuff about french laws but I can't really find real infos about this issue on the web.

None of those responses are refutations homu

How so? @Chaos

all I can say is that this law forbid foreign NGOs to promote, help, advertise or anything abortion related to US people on US soil (And maybe US NGO on foreign soil but I'm not sure on that point, plus it doesn't really concern you guys)

you will tell me that it's another claim that I don't back up, but a lot of imigrants or non-english speakers in the US depends on these NGOs for this subject

if you want exact sources, trump did that on the 23th of this month, do yourself a favor and please search for it

@Homu H. Saying that something is intentional doesn't change the fact that it remains a logical fallacy

That was with simply one response, you said "none of those."

And I wasn't saying that as a means to refute it, it was just an explanation.

Yea, I really don't think I can explain it to you in a way you will understand. Quite frankly it's too much effort. I don't expect you to change the way you respond if that is the level of explantion you provide for the things I brought up. Its far past what I can be fucked doing to write you an essay explaining logical fallacies and why your responses do not provide conclusive argument or even convinicing ampliative argument.

hey chaos, you should really back up that claims with sources or you will get a fail from homu's class !

Oh NO!

Fuck

:p

So basically there's nothing then

it's already too late for me apparently as I'm an autist that push my students to fail, but it's still time for you chaos

In my defense I did say twice now I was just gonna throw out the claim and move on

no, not the hammer your honor

I always thought it was funny how you guys call the judge in english... "Mr. Justice". pfahaha

1 be homu
2 Get into argument
3 repeat strange incredulous reasoning
4 fail to understand claims
5 demand explanation
6 repeat steps 3-5
7 when other person can’t be fucked anymore claim victory

🏆 here you go

You explained the problem with one of the explanations and then went "HAH UR 2 STOOPED TO UNDERSTAND ITD BE A WAIST OF MY TIM!!!" when I told you that you only responded to the one easy one

i'm gonna try an Ad Homunem

do shemale have periods too ?

Oh I've spotted another fallacy in the wild, here folks we have the illusive Straw man.

But that's pretty much what happened tho

You just said it'd be a waste of your time going through it and that I wouldn't understand

You never responded to the other explanations

You specifically targetted the one that validated you and acted as if I was defending myself while saying you were wrong, despite the fact I was saying "Yes I understand and you're right, here's why I do it"

@Null ok

Huh

Wait what

Dont worry about it

So I found out how KC works

I mean I guess it wasn't that hard to figure out

it's literally just teleporing but in time? I guess that's how you explain it

It's difficult to explain but kinda makes sense

I just finished watching this

a picture?

Yeah

It's called Angel's Egg