Whether it is with the law, their community, their school or their parents, it's simply not a net positive.

I know, but the kids don't have to be doing activism.

They can keep their views private, like me.

Smart.

So you define youth outreach as "redpilling them"?

Even though most people I know are conservatives, most probably wouldn't accept identitarianism, yet.

That's cool. So what do you think the role of activism and content producers is?

Explaining the ideology to them, getting them into it.

Sounds to me like that is already covered.

The role of activism is to get people into an ideology.

I mean like activism focused to teenagers, and not just college kids and adults.

Technically the role of activism is to broadcast one's presence, promote an organization and raise awareness to an issue, but you're close enough.

What would activism focused on teenagers look like?

Thats hard.

I'm not an activist so I wouldn't really know.

But I'm sure activists could figure it out.

So no solution then, interesting.

...

I'm not proposing a way to do it, I'm just saying it's something they should do.

There are legal and public perception implications when it comes to reaching out to underage children.

Which is why it isn't done.

Don't left wing groups do it?

This is also why cuckservative groups like TPUSA are only on college campuses.

Like pro-lgbt groups?

Maybe through media, beyond that, not really.

Those groups also operate within the sphere of the cathedral, so it wouldn't be an issue for them like it would be for us.

I appreciate your criticism, but most of these things have already been considered and decided upon for a reason.

I see..

If you had some ideas or direction on what should be done, I'd be all ears.

Not trying to neg you motivated young dudes into the ground, but most of your concerns have already been considered and eschewed for very good reasons.

I wish I had been redpilled at your age, in a way.

I redpilled myself.

I come from an ultra conservative backround so when I saw what happened to rhodesia and SA it wasn't that hard.

South Africa huh?

Would you think some sort of activism focused around the SA genocide would be a positive thing?

Propaganda, flashy videos from groups like GI, IE serve as 'youth outreach' as does social media. Beyond that, I don't see much more that can be done, while still maintaining a reasonable reputation and legal safety.

Imagine a journalist uncovering GI going to highschools and kiddie pop concerts (think Taylor Swift, Grande, etc) and trying to recruit them.

Imagine the "child grooming into far right politics" headlines

We need to think outside of the box, but there is a very good reason that metapolitical organizations operate in the manner that they do, on both sides.

So what are your guys standings on multiculturalism?

A nation can have a negligible amount of ethnic diversity (1-5%) and still remain cohesive, and have little risk of a 5th column forming. Beyond that it's a detriment.