Message from @dunce
Discord ID: 336245453542785024
You say waste time but that time would have saved you money
so there's no point to compare the two of them if you don't compare them equally
wasting time researching is potentially wasting money 😉
which you then recoup after the research
endless loop
I know, but the point isn't really if he bought his PC pre built for 2000 or if he built it himself for 1400
His original point was that it's more expensive on PC to get console level performance
he's comparing the 4k capabilities of that PC with a console that deliver something else entierly
So it definitely is the point
checkerboard 4k has nothing to do with native 4k
so let's say he bought the part himself instead of contracting a company for that, he would have paid it 1400 or so instead of 2000
which lowers the entry point into pc gaming substantially
that would still be more expensive, no matter what, even if the total was 1000 bucks
but the fact that he's comparing it with a company that cheat people into selling "native 4k" is the real point
but as you said, the pc build actually is more powerful because it doesn't do fake 4k
it's not the traditionnal upscale technology, but it's still upscaling behind the scene...
if you were to use checkerboard rendering and adaptive res on pc then the price to "achieve" 4k would lower again
that's my point, yeah
but nobody really want to bother doing that for PC games
again I agree
few games support such things
Since a user has greater control over settings to achieve what they want
you could get a PC to play Portal 2 in checkerboard 4k 60fps for less than 500 bucks
I used portal 2 as an example because I know that the game has the settings to run in checkerboard 4k
I didn't know it did
Huh, the more you know
it's old but it's probably the only reason it even has this setting...
GOOD FU KING MORNONG
<:Tech_Morning:299741747238535169>
Wow what a dickhead
Oh my God
Lmao
This guy clearly doesn't get that you can't just sleep with both