Message from @Double Negative
Discord ID: 501806050832285706
we could easily make more
kek
it wasnt a fast process
it didnt pick up til the 50s
the nukes from the 40's were only good as a show of force
somewhat untrue i mean
as weapons they were kinda shit due to their expense and low amount
well they were pretty effective
well we also had a better military
and they would have to go thru siberia
they were effective but wouldnt win a war
no
you could knock out a whole lot of industry or administration
we could just bomb the railroads
they just werent tactical weapons
bomb moscow lel
actually macarthur's idea during the korean war was very smart
he wanted to bomb the mountain passes in manchuria
yeah it would be an easy win tbqhwy famalam
basically destroy the method the chinese used to get troops into korea
plus, even if america had enough nukes to bomb a handful of cities in the soviet union, the manufacturing and industrial infrastructure was moved so deep into the soviet union that no contemporary bomber could have hit those cities
dangerously cheesy
geist is right
but they were already heavily damaged from fighting with germs
nukes arent a factor in a hypothetical us-soviet war in 45
by 45
well it wouldn't be over quickly
it wouldnt be an easy war yea
the main US advantage is airpower and the second advantage is a better logistical train
so it would become a factor
but u.s would win fo sho
even an ocean away
but no way the US could invade like the germans did
in 41
never
OH SHIT LMAO
idk if the us could handle the atrocities the germans handled
atrocities
the US public would demand a peace