https://twitter.com/NickJFuentes/status/1061306523333332992

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1061295979297759233

Isnt this where the Bush/Gore reccount happened?

yeah

The people in charge of elections there need purging

massive

<:kirk:448919445231108116>

MARIO!

<:comfy:286526459596636160>

i got muted for saying mario

for an hour

<:GWsetmyxPeepoWeird:405337568155009024>

Hey, so, I usually just come here for help finding arugments and counter-arguments. Sorry not sorry.

A leftist friend of mine told me about the anti-discrimination lawsuit filed against Trump back in the 70's. Apparently, blacks would be told certain apartments weren't available, but whites would be told they were. It is believed that Donald Trump knew about this practice and did nothing to stop it, and might've even been responsible for it.

I'm not a cocksucker who defends Trump for being Trump. I've looked at the arguments that Trump was guilty, so now I want to ask here: is there any reason to believe he was not guilty of overt racial discrimination?

i never bothered to research trump or his history , but i think he hired a fair amount of "diverse" folk , if you want to use that word

dont quote me tho

i also remember hearing that he didnt know about that situation and it was resolved but i really have no idea

go do your own research

the best kind

I have heard what ghobe has said, but again I don't know the full story. It seems one of things that is only occasionally brought up so it must not make him look *that* bad.

Either way....it was also back in the 70's. So I don't think it would be very relevant today anyways.

This is the thing that was really damning:

"He said, 'Well, I'm only doing what my boss told me to do — I am not allowed to rent to black tenants,' " Morse says.

The commissioner asked the building superintendent to take him to his boss. That turned out to be Trump Management.

(taken from NPR)

ah

It looks like it was Fred Trump's decision, but Donald Trump made a public statement that it 1. it was only discrimination against welfare recipients, and 2. it was justified, because renting to them would mean “€massive fleeing from the city of not only our tenants, but communities as a whole.” In other words, white flight.

The court proved that #1 was a lie.

So..

In conclusion, Trump approved of and defended his father's decision to discriminate against black tenants on the ground that it was to prevent white flight. This rankles me.

eh oh well <:shiiiiit:348458410217308170> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

pee pee poo poo

https://www.apnews.com/12b857e5305042f39336e814fdaeb5b8
>A manifesto on the group’s website declares that “the sovereignty of states is hereby replaced by the sovereignty of citizens.”
This sounded interesting until I realised they have the same immigration stance as the EU
https://europeanbalconyproject.eu/en/manifesto
>We recognize that Europe’s wealth is based on the exploitation of other continents and the suppression of other cultures over centuries. For that reason, we are happy to share our territory with those whom we have driven from theirs. **Anyone who wishes to can be a European.** The European Republic is the first step on the path to a** global democracy.**

We are so sorry for things that happened before you were born come here and you will get infinite gibs

Ahhh Europe is not the USA. If I go to China do I become Chinese? of course not

what about the euro countries who didn't have colonies in Africa? What about when north africans and arabs took over parts of southern europe? The Byzantine empire is gone now.

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1061664756271067143

<:laff:387622602111320065>

we're going to act like dicks, when you pull our press passes, we're going to sue, how very jew of you

I mean, oops, didn't mean to type jew out sorry

He's not a damn reporter, he's trying to make political statements.

worse, he's dying for attention too, partisan hack, implies things and goes off topic all the time. All they're doing is pushing the globalist narrative any chance they get. He's also hostile towards the president and his staff.

Partisan hacks.

it makes no sense why Jeff Zucker's contract was extended for 2yrs when cnn's ratings tanked either. Makes no sense at all.

This proves it.
I don't even know a liberal that takes themself even somewhat seriously would think Acosta is doing anything except throwing temper tantrums.

I'm not the problem! NOPE! I act like an idiot and imply things and make wild assumptions, then when called out I act shocked and scream some sort of discrimination, see how that works?

MEANWHILE reality check, remember CNN caught manipulating the audience for dems, giving them the questions ahead of time, dems approving which questions can be asked, and CNN makes believe the audience wasn't hand picked and just a bunch of regular people

Acosta is guilty of the fake concern bit too