Or, rather, "exaggerating".

No I’m not lying to you.

Yes, you are.

Let me say it again,

You can't even source your claims.

You’re taking it too far.

Yes I can.

No, you are.

I just did.

I used the same article can I not?

You called it a "civil war". Not me.

That's taking it too far.

Yes I exaggerated.

Yes, you can link the same event 50 times when you have no other events to show.

Of course you can.

Yes, you did.

Dishonestly so.

Just admit it's not true.

No Vlad.

Of course not. You want to lie.

lol

That’s the point of an exaggeration.

Now

Holy fuck

I gave you an explanation above

So, you're saying you exaggerated, because what you found is not even remotely close to what you described?

Why can’t you just swallow it?

Is your throat too small?

Because it's horse shit.

Yes, unlike yours. lol

It’s an -exaggeration-

Yes, because what happened in reality is nothing.

Which was proven after you failed to source it.

My point isn’t wrong. But the exaggeration is. *Point of an hyperbole*

You failed to source it so hard

that you literally had to link the same event twice.

Three instances

two of which are the same one.

That's how hard you failed to source it.

If what you were syaing was even remotely close to the truth,

you wouldn't have needed to "exaggerate it".