So basically what you are telling me

You don’t believe

based on reason

Nor do you disbelieve in te existence of god

Since there has not been enough evidence to prove either of them right

yes, like a court case to which there isnt enough evidence, i would find the defendent not guilty, and that doesnt mean i think they are innocent

Exactly

So you wouldn’t really be an atheist

yes i would

You would be more of an agnostic

No since you don’t believe nor do you disbelieve in the existence of god

you are just brainwashed and are experiencing short circuiting

im a deist

mor like

You have not been shown enough evidence to prove either of them right

yeah , so making a decision would be UNINFORMED

until more evidence is found

therefore i am more of a deist

Yea so you wouldn’t really be an atheist nor would you be a deist you would be a middle thing

god may/may not exist, but if he does, he doesnt give a shit about much except for the orbitals of electrons and keeping atoms in line

Fair enough

So let’s call you an inbetweener

Basically a centrist

no, a deistic atheist

but there is no deist option

Yea a middle thing

deism has no books

I’m sure you could find a book on deism somewhere

but if it was, it would be more of a science theory book

Probably

But meh I like faith

Which is why I became religious

I was agnostic before

But eh

I felt like the old lads got something right

faith is not good, its like using a screen door in you submarine

Kek yea

But eh maybe they got it right

no they didnt

not using faith

Plus you don’t wanna miss out on dem sick Xp bonuses in battle