Message from @Dagrad
Discord ID: 678304168439447582
I don't know.
Yeagh
Yeah what?
So, what's your question
> If god does exist above logic, then there would be no way to prove his existence logically, so any argument for his existence would require empirical evidence
The requirement for empirical evidence follows the same logical trend.
Why can't God transcend it? Why can't he exist without being proven?
If you make a positive claim you have to back it up with some sort of proof or justification
That's answering questions about who would be correct in a dialogue.
Why can't he exist without being proven?
How can you say something exists without any proof or justification for it?
I am not saying anything. You're telling me that he does not exist.
And your argument is that in a discussion
a party making an "active" claim has to provide proof.
My question is this: why cannot God exist without us having proved he does?
I don't know. Is he?
Sure, if you say so.
So, Does Santa Claus exist ?
I don't know.
I don't know? You're telling me they don't.
So prove it.
You must prove existence you fucking retard
Why?
Cuz it don't exist you dumb
Prove it?
I loss billions brain cells cuz of you
You must prove existence
Why must I?
Don't need prove unexistence
Why?
You can say Mosters exist
You can say Ghosts exist