Message from @thomas the choo choo tree

Discord ID: 575328497979883522


2019-05-07 14:25:41 UTC  

wait what i said sounds messed up, sorry

2019-05-07 14:25:53 UTC  

I've explained to you why your analogy is incorrect but you keep repeating it, which is very confusing

2019-05-07 14:26:00 UTC  

I'm saying the idea of potential can send you down so many paths

2019-05-07 14:26:18 UTC  

he's basically saying to just phrase your sentences better

2019-05-07 14:26:21 UTC  

Like, the mom not having the child could lead to her having better potential

2019-05-07 14:26:27 UTC  

But the McGriddle at McDonald's is so good

2019-05-07 14:26:40 UTC  

See, a baby requires two sets of DNA in order to develop, 50% of that DNA will never create a life. 100% of that DNA mixing in a specific environment is what creates a baby

2019-05-07 14:27:03 UTC  

Okay, but, when do you deem it as having potential??

2019-05-07 14:27:30 UTC  

Once the natural processes occurring, if left unimpeded, would result in a baby

2019-05-07 14:28:02 UTC  

So once a man finished inside a woman

2019-05-07 14:28:06 UTC  

That is what I define as a potential person.

2019-05-07 14:28:19 UTC  

So a condom is then impeding potential

2019-05-07 14:28:21 UTC  

Yes. Once the sperm has traveled into the egg and a zygote is formed.

2019-05-07 14:28:56 UTC  

How do you feel about morning after pills??

2019-05-07 14:29:03 UTC  

My entire argument is life as conception, if conception has not occurred then the potential has not begun. There is no "impeding potential" because the potential for life has not been created ***until*** the zygote has formed

2019-05-07 14:29:05 UTC  

ok it's common that people would have unprotected sex relying on pulling out is it not

2019-05-07 14:29:09 UTC  

Against, because it kills the zygote

2019-05-07 14:29:44 UTC  

that means that unprotected sex doesn't necessarily end up with the woman impregnated

2019-05-07 14:29:48 UTC  

Brain activity does not occur until after the first trimester, can we then agree that it is not alive nor having potential until the second trimester??

2019-05-07 14:30:00 UTC  

yes

2019-05-07 14:30:03 UTC  

yee

2019-05-07 14:30:10 UTC  

No, because, once again, if left unimpeded, brain activity would begin

2019-05-07 14:30:15 UTC  

well i mean it has potential of life

2019-05-07 14:30:33 UTC  

But, it has the potential to then have potential

2019-05-07 14:30:41 UTC  

Your stance is not potential then

2019-05-07 14:30:47 UTC  

but potential of life can also be, as komrade said, lost in menstruation/'jerking off'

2019-05-07 14:30:50 UTC  

I've defined potential as beginning the moment a zygote is formed, numerous times. I'm not really sure what you're getting at

2019-05-07 14:31:01 UTC  

Define potential

2019-05-07 14:31:09 UTC  

I just did in the sentence above....

2019-05-07 14:31:16 UTC  

BillcatToday at 10:30 AM
I've defined potential as beginning the moment a zygote is formed

2019-05-07 14:31:29 UTC  

And previous to this, multiple timems

2019-05-07 14:31:55 UTC  

but sperm and egg has potential

2019-05-07 14:32:04 UTC  

Potential, in this context, would be the ability for a human to form if natural processes, beginning with the formation of a zygote, are left unimpeded

2019-05-07 14:32:10 UTC  

they have potential to become zygote

2019-05-07 14:32:13 UTC  

And we're back to square one, smh

2019-05-07 14:32:20 UTC  

they have potential to become potential lmao

2019-05-07 14:32:23 UTC  

yea

2019-05-07 14:32:28 UTC  

ouch that hurt

2019-05-07 14:32:32 UTC  

Ok, but I don't care about the potential to become potential

2019-05-07 14:32:34 UTC  

The potential argument is a continuous regression

2019-05-07 14:32:35 UTC  

so that's still potential, it's just less potential