Message from @Kekistani American
Discord ID: 682337825173143565
lmaooooo
well
I don't see the "new mod" post anymore
oh. because i reported it probably.
For those needing a good laugh AND a possible reason to get warned, here's some fresh content for you
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/fa01yl/croikey_look_at_the_soize_of_thaht_up_vote_we/
They might be trying to create a false atmosphere with the r/donald. What I mean is to create false posts and insert more anti trump posts in it. So people believe it
Like how r/worldpolitics went
Not as long as we keep making good stuff like we used to 🙂
like the post I just linked to
Spez's comment was funny that they could sway elections. Just look at the uk one, tons of anti boris posts and echo chambers yet he won a super majority
Just flood it with memes and laughable puns and we should be good, I hope 😄
I'm just gunna post as much good content as I can before I get the boot from reddit for reasons unknown. All i/we can do
I generally dont post on reddit, only have it on read only
So whos in control of the discord
spez
Nah, it's staying in control of the mods, and people who aren't associated with the ownership of Reddit. THey have no David Bowie power over us.
Hey I've returned to Discord after a month and for some reason I was no longer subbed to this channel. Who can help me? I've already been vetted
What are you trying to do?
Do I need to be vetted again?
Hi team.
(just came to the discord, reddit refugee)
i have a reddit account but ive always been a lurker
hrm. dank memes? dunno
i have a maga hat with me now, and the time ive been subscribed
never bothered with cuckbook
on an unrelated note
are they still removing mods?
i dont see lalicat, sheguevara, eatonfools
yes.. /td will be taken over by tomorrow it seems
so many comment locked posts
so guys what's with the lincoln bashing?
reddit doesn't want to lose the revenue source from t_d
@christiam seems pretty self evident from the comments? some people believe that his expansion of federal powers was ultimately a sore spot on his legacy
As if that's bad in wartime.
Well, there's certainly an argument for it being wrong at ANY time. And technically war was optional. (im not endorsing any particular view)
Yes, but that argument also concedes that the United States would've been dissolved or weakened.
Secession was also never mentioned in the constitution regardless, as if the South even had a guaranteed right.
Arguably it doesn't have to be. A social contract can be cancelled at any time, although ideally upon violation of it by one of the relevant parties. So essentially, there's no such thing as secession being illegal. The South said, our deal is over, the Constitution does not apply to me. The North then simply declared war (since there is now no existing agreement between the entities) and conquered the South.
This is not right or wrong by itself, absent context. This is law of the wild among states.