Message from @christiam
Discord ID: 682385243558117424
Screenshot (Feb 26, 2020 7:24:31 PM)
I stay up to date and educated and write to politicians
I am among friends now
A picture of Eric carimella
In China, for the worse, the government destroyed old Chinese ideas such as Confucianism.
So, it's highly plausible that culture is influenced by government, among other things.
Im not saying it cant be im saying it shouldnt be
Even when corporations decide to push gender theory?
Correct.
Ideally that corporation would go woke go broke
If not, its one thing to be influenced by Mao telling you to submit or die, its another to be influenced by some mandatory seminars and subliminal ads.
Gucci, for example, hasn't seen a major decline in profits, yet they recently launched an ad campaign whose central idea was "gender-fluidity".
If people gave it a second thought they wouldnt be influenced
Either that or they want to be influenced for another reason
The average person isn't culturally conservative, so it's not like they care if Google promotes globo-homo.
You cant outlegislate ignorance. If you can combat it at all, its through the community
The objective wouldn't be to out-legislate apathy. It would be to prevent companies from pushing destructive cultural changes.
Too idealistic for today's government, obviously, but a conservative culture is superior to a liberal one.
sperm banks are degenerate and need to be banned, change my mind
If the PEOPLE cant be trusted with preventing companies from destroying culture, what makes you think outsourcing that responsibility to the government is any safer? If people are apathetic the govt will use that power to corrupt culture as well
By pushing open borders?
oh shit yall are actually having a intellectual debate nvm
Sperm Banks should be considered child abuse actually
Unless you are married
A company has economic reasons for pushing degenerate liberal things, because consumerism and open-borders generate huge profits.
Putting a kid in a scenario without a father is so beyond fucked
Imagine being that selfish
I do agree, to an extent, that a government could be culturally destructive, like in China.
A govt need only keep corporate interests domestic, not control the attitudes that make corporations capable of pursuing certain things
you know what caused companies to become so evil
at least partially
Making them legally have to maximize profits
if they aren't fully owned by one person
I'm not advocating for a general or vague cultural filter, I'm advocating for a specific ban on certain destructive things.
It's possible, like with smoking for example.
We stopped smoking ads, and it had an effect on # of smokers.
Hard disagree. Theyre not always maximizing profits anymore anyway, they pursue personal agendas. Soros is technically influencing them as a person, much like we have the power to do in the aggregate.
I mean, their personal agenda barely costs them a fraction of their total profits.
They have money to spare, especially to influence the nation.
Well ChrisTiam, i hope someday a govt doesnt decide conservatism or gun ownership are "destructive" habits that need to be banned.