Message from @CalamityBomb
Discord ID: 693216836417749013
"The Republican party, as we noted at the beginning of the book, is an insurgent outlier. It has become ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts, evidence, and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition, all but declaring war on the government. The Democratic party, while no paragon of civic virtue, is more ideologically centered and diverse, protective of the government's role as it developed over the course of the last century, open to incremental changes in policy fashioned through bargaining with the Republicans, and less disposed to or adept at take-no-prisoners conflict between parties. This is asymmetry between the parties, which journalists and scholars often brush aside or whitewash in a quest for "balance", constitutes a huge obstacle to effective governance." - Norm Ornstein Political Scientist, Non biased, ranked 100 top minds.
sounds good
They may even leave on their own!
what do we do about quebec afterwards?
This is why it was a big deal when President Trump was threatening to make a trade deal with Mexico while excluding Canada
Why can't I post on the subreddit anymore?
Quebec can just be sold to Boris Johnson
"The Republican party, as we noted at the beginning of the book, is an insurgent outlier. It has become ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts, evidence, and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition, all but declaring war on the government. The Democratic party, while no paragon of civic virtue, is more ideologically centered and diverse, protective of the government's role as it developed over the course of the last century, open to incremental changes in policy fashioned through bargaining with the Republicans, and less disposed to or adept at take-no-prisoners conflict between parties. This is asymmetry between the parties, which journalists and scholars often brush aside or whitewash in a quest for "balance", constitutes a huge obstacle to effective governance." - Norm Ornstein Political Scientist, Non biased, ranked 100 top minds.
Half of them want to be European again anyhow
yikes. well if thats the move then we need to buy greenland
As my friend often says “we fought to keep our dependence”
i actually love the idea of buying greenland
at least from what i read about it
Actually there has been some real talk here about Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskathcewan separating from Canada. Very unlikely but they are using it as an ugly stick.
I love the idea of just taking Greenland because Denmark can do exactly nothing about it.
lmao
US provides half of the European military
Fuck you EU/NATOCUCKS ye ye <a:dabbing:603507904456425482>
Oh hey I got approved
Ahem Trump 2020
Theres approval for general now?
Jfc
You guys remembered how the Wu-Flu hit the Uighur concentration camps? I can't find an article written after February. It's like they dropped the "Poor Chinese muslim" narrative as soon as they started to defend China.
Anyone else really sick of the cucks calling "The Chinese Virus" a racist term? smh
Rice rabies
Wait that's the first Im hearing of this
Yeah, during February, there were quite a bit of articles about it.
Think also as early as January
That's wild
Not a peep. As if the CCP let them die
Mwasta you're being a little bit too thick headed.
'Chinese virus' _is_ a racist term.
You're right. They dropped it like it was hot. China is so well-defended by the media
Whaddup you unvetted fucks
Hi
If we can't be honest that labeling a virus in a way that sounds like its for a specific race, then we are going to get the moderates annoyed.
Im calling it China virus too and im Korean
China virus is fine.
<#665555087782969355>