if stoping that life source means killing it, then yes it should have the right
YOu dont call a seed a tree even tho it has the potential to be a tree
What happened to the unalienable rights
End of the day I’d rather keep myself alive than any of you guys LMAO
Same with humans
Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
Tru
Not funny alex
what are you even saying john
It’s not a joke
Retard
you're jumping around
Not a funny joke
If i got attached to you and had to cut off your limbs so that i can live freely, im doing it
do you think using clones for surgery/science is wrong?
YES
the difference is that ur partly responsible for the making of the person ur attached to
And it’s not merely cutting off
That cutting off would kill me
Do U have no moral scruples
Well it's an ethical issue.
Yeah
YEah and i would kill you to be able to live freely
More likely you'd get killed by me
that’s morally wrong
Or anyone else
If i suddenly became your life source tomorrow, i would cut off every limb of you to free myself
i’m back
and selfish
Ok? you still dont have any right to use me as a life support
hi Val
The problem is we don't have a definition for human.
hi pompy
Ok i dont give a flying fuck
I don’t have a right
If the law defined what a human life was
this whole debate wouldn't exist
But in the case of an unplanned pregnancy
Nobody can use me as life support
you could get away with cloning
