<:beanie:463084349642899468>

🤔

Dang that deant work

<:beanie:463084349642899468>
🤔

Neither does that...

@NativeInterface <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyFQVZ2h0V8>

my phd in mspaint is paying off

i am a true artist

Too bad there is a limit to the amount of emojis you can have per server

@da britian

there you go

ooo, I'm always late to the party.

yours is better, mine doesnt have transparency

At least I know you're a cool dude coz you use dark mode 😎

I'm trying out a new form of paintin'

It's pretty good

I post it here and not general, because bare butt.

you drew that?

do you have DA or Pixiv?

Yeah but I rarely update anything.

I draw mostly for myself and my big future projects.

You can google scribblehatch and find all you want quite easily

You've got a bit of talent there mate.

why are you drawing naked children?

is this piece commissioned by Tony Podesta or what?

are those lolis?

You really need more practice. You forgot the basic step of drawing their clothes.

Looks good though

lol

You guys aren't actually panicked over **that** are you?

This is the one form of virtue signalling that has preceded and outlasted all the others. s:

Loli-police here, sir we gonna need you to turn over all of your lolis.....for evidence....nothing else

https://youtu.be/YjT2FhubAf0?t=1m4s

I don't think he ever dreamed he'd be playing Khrushchev.

yeah it's amazing how people just keep speaking out against pedophilia, i don't understand it myself 🤷

It's just a drawing with no sexual content. Pedophilia is a serious issue and calling something as minor as that pedophilia is only doing a disservice by watering down the word. It's the same shit as a radfem calling a man staring at her 'rape culture'.

Weren't you just defending a broad definition of art earlier today? Do you think Henry Darger's work is pedophilic, because that drawing is very tame in comparison to much of his.

im not saying it isn't art

this is still art