not a child if they're 2000 years old

That's 'new parent' to me.

Since I still think of a 7 year old as young.

Either way, you're self-righteous about it.

You did it in two different ways

as a childess person, i can believe you would think that

One: "Hey I'm a DAD. I get to shove my weight around on these things."

Two: "What have you done with YOUR LIFE?"

And you just lowkey did it again.

What a jackass.

You think you're done working on yourself?

you are so easy to wind up, its gold

God forbid your kid picks any of this up from you.

i am most definitely not done working on myself

--Aight?

I... agree.

I mean it was a rhetorical question.

The short version of all this is

If you don't like the PREMISE of the art, don't even comment.

Criticism is fine, but that means you like the premise and wish to improve it.

Andrew Klavan had a way better spiel about this that I can't remember offhand.

I don't like anything zombie. I just don't comment.

He's typing but I have a feeling he's gonna be a knucklehead. I'd love to be wrong.

shorter version is, if you don't want people to talk about your art, dont post it public 🤷

You didn't talk about my art

You talked about ME.

or just grow a thicker skin

My intentions.

The thin skin is on you.

ok revised edition: dont draw pics of naked children if you dont want people to question your motives

You can't even see it without your Jack Thompson cells going into a frenzy

He's back to this.

He has learned literally nothing.

If I drew a grisly murder, would you have anything to say at all?

if you have a clear conscious then whatever anyone says about you should roll off your back. i am way over it

If I drew a grisly murder, would you have anything to say at all?

I'm going to ping you with this question later if you don't answer it now.

hey hey hey. i really dont care enough to be still talking about this

I'm going to ping you later.

You coward.

but if you want to keep milking it for the attention, go ahead