katana vs. katana, it's not a battlefield weapon

It's testing whether a katana would be effective against a man wearing armor made of longswords

lol

Katanas were absolutely battlefield weapons.

barely, and mostly during WW2, before that polearms ruled the battlefield

it's probably just to show people who only hear about katanas in pulp culture

as well as bows of course

Also are we discussing actualy *katana* katanas or just any katana pattern sword

and think they can actually cut though steel

they should try it against a bulletproof vest

i mean kevlar

Well yeah, Japan's main battlefield weapon was a yari, but what does that have to do with the effectiveness of katanas?

They carried them around because they were useful. Same as why arming swords were used in the crusades

they should try it against a ww2 tank

katanas aren't designed for battlefield use, they're for katana vs. katana duels

No

I think the design of the katana is a result of the poor resources that japan had. say, if they had better metal, I'm sure they would have much more functional swords (as well as actual metal armor)

They were used for situations where you'd want a sword.

@Schedrevka what do you expect? It aired on RTL2, the german channel best known for its horrible reality tv series.

had they been designed for battle instead of say aesthetics they would have straight hilts

Yeah, like I said before I just wouldn't take any TV show on this sort of thing seriously

What

guys lets drink ourselves to death and become one in LCL <:shocku:444208665864699914>

not sure when i would need a sword

You really think someone is going to put their life on the line over aesthetics?

Fllly me to the moooon

People depended on those weapons for generations

uwu swords

*katanas were only ever used to kill unarmored peasants, change my mind*

so you're saying they were useful?

There's something to be said for Japan's lack of expirimentation and strict traditionalism, but they're fine weapons

yes

fine given the resources they had

No, just fine in general.

you think this was the most efficient armor design out there, and that sacrifices weren't made for the sake of aesthetics?

japan is fine with weaponry until they try to make a nambu hehe

I never said it was the best armor out there.

>You really think someone is going to put their life on the line over aesthetics?

yes

I do believe that

because when I look at the armor they wore