traps are traps. A female trap with no dick is still a trap

Why are you talking past each other

@da britian yep, that's from popular use for the search alone

I gave the example "reverse rape", it's exactly used the same way

you use it online to find the content you want

but you would never use it IRL unironically

@da britian exactly

it's used as a search term and as a joke

but never in a serious manner

what have i done

>if you fap to rape porn, are you a rapist?
If you fap to rape porn, you are a rape-porn afficionado or whatever.
A better analogy is: If you fap to child porn, you are a pedophile, but not necessarily a child abuser yourself

"Trap" itself is never used in a serious manner

except when referring to a literal trap like a concealed spike pit, a landmine, or an ambush

but yeah, on 4chan Trap was a pejorative from the start, it's only in later years that the use has shifted to mean something more positive in certain circles, mainly reddit with /r/trap

@Crow A better analogy is: If you fap to child porn, you are a pedophile, but not necessarily a child abuser yourself
Doesn't this contradict your previous sentence?

Fapping to a content doesn't make assign you the label the content is about

no? if you fap to rape porn, you are a rape-porn afficionado or whatever, but not necessarily a rapist

cp is banned everywhere, but I wouldn't claim that anyone that watches it is a pedo

Why not? That's literally the definition of a pedophile

if you fap to loli hentai, you aren't a pedo either

no that's not

let's go back to definitions then

go from there

>pedophile
>a person who is sexually attracted to children.

right

unless you mean that any kind of porn category you watch means you are sexually attracted to it.

I wouldn't

if you are sexually aroused by porn featuring children (real or simulated), you are a pedophile

that is too broad of a use

dangerous too imo

well you can just watch it as part of your legal investigation, watch it for raw curiosity, or whatever, but if you're into something, then yeah

bingo, there's 1001 reasons you could be watching it

watching something doesn't mean in ANY WAY that you agree or like what you are watching

you are assuming intent from a viewer

if you are sexually aroused by what you're watching, you're sexually aroused by what you're watching. there's no assumption being made here

and we label these people who are sexually aroused by watching nekkid kids pedophiles

just like we label people who are aroused by seeing nekkid people of their own sex as homosexuals (or bisexuals if they're also aroused by seeing naked people of the opposite sex)

lets be clear, you can't assume someone is "sexually aroused" by watching something

even if they did, I wouldn't assume them as pedos

>you can't assume someone is "sexually aroused" by watching something
No need to. That's something you can physically measure, and a lot of people will just straight up confess to it