yeah, I'm trying to argue in good faith

no you aren't

What if she's like 16, has Double D and wears makeup?

no sane person would mistake a 5 year old for an adult, but a 17 year old with early onset wrinkles... sure

or makeup yeah

12 mate

12

don't strawman

wanna set any more parameters?

hair color perhaps?

makeup or no?

Hm,, Blonde??

you were the one picking an age that was convinient for you. Because your same argument doesn't work if the girl is 12

pedophilia definition is only specific to age

that's the only factor we are using

no, pedophilia refers to *prepubescent*, which correlates with age and is usually legally defined as age, but the definition of prepubescent is physical

still, 12 in within the bounds of said definition

well in my counrty 14 is the legal age sooooooooooooo

👀

In japan it's 13

👀

i know

Crow thinks that if you get a stiffy for someone that is underage, you will be burned with the label for life

what

what

what

no it's not, age of 12 is not a clear boundary, some girls hit puberty at 9, some at 14

`Pedophilia is defined as the fantasy or act of sexual activity with children who are generally age 13 years or younger. `

>: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object specifically
>: a psychiatric disorder in which an adult has sexual fantasies about or engages in sexual acts with a prepubescent child

but yes, 12 works **generally**

and that's the problem with your example

and why I asked if you wanted to slap any more parameters in

before we proceed

it still gets you the label, by your loosy use of labels

by whom?

by the law? yeah, the law isn't clear enough

by me? not a chance

i label u label-man :P

it **generally** gets you that label, depending on if the **specific** 12 year old child you get aroused by is prepubescent or not

go back to talking about traps

http://puu.sh/Cb9Dg.jpg