Message from @Korin Dickman

Discord ID: 692847864577130557


2020-03-24 19:48:22 UTC  

what does this have to do with top attack

2020-03-25 20:21:47 UTC  

Eh, he is a good man. He make's valid point's and is quite versed in topic's. From my view people dislike him because he randomly spergs.

2020-03-25 20:22:26 UTC  

When you bring something of a topic that he is quite "Invested" into. He goes on a rant.

2020-03-25 20:29:05 UTC  

Ok i can agree with the Radio voice.

2020-03-25 20:29:29 UTC  

Eh, different tastes then.

2020-03-26 01:41:20 UTC  
2020-03-26 18:13:57 UTC  

Very Intresting.

2020-03-26 18:20:56 UTC  

Yes, he is.

2020-03-26 21:04:56 UTC  

Isn't he a larpagan?

2020-03-26 21:06:07 UTC  

He is a pagan but very much unlike Varg

2020-03-26 21:07:22 UTC  

Honestly, I am fine with pagan's like him. His video's are quite intresting to.

2020-03-26 21:25:57 UTC  

🤔

2020-03-26 21:26:10 UTC  

I mean as long as he doesn't go "hurr christcucks" then I guess it's alright

2020-03-26 21:29:15 UTC  

From the looks of it (since we know only him how he presents himself) he is more upstanding man then most catholics I know.

2020-03-26 21:30:03 UTC  

But we don't have full picture of his person, as mentioned.

2020-03-26 21:37:19 UTC  

He's up there with Jared Taylor regarding respectable people I can think of

2020-03-28 08:40:53 UTC  

Good video by Lovely Porridge on 'Loser Nationalism' and why "accelerationism" and ironically supporting left-wing candidates is a waste of time and destructive: https://youtu.be/KSiqBMZMG8E

2020-03-28 10:18:25 UTC  

Didn't like it
He was getting pissed off at Spencer, Keith and Dutton for discussing islam at an arms length. It was far from them just indulging in the white Sharia meme but Dutton bringing up his book on the topic about how Islam/religiosity is an evolutionary strategy etc.

2020-03-28 10:18:36 UTC  

Comes off as preachy

2020-03-28 10:22:11 UTC  

That being said yeah people shouldn't support "left wing" (since it's implied he was talking about Spencer etc. he prolly meant Keith "supporting" Bloomberg) candidates but you're going to have to make an actual case against that

2020-03-28 10:23:56 UTC  

It's more complicated than just wishfull thinking; they had more nuanced takes on the question and discussed it at length whether right or wrong

2020-03-28 11:54:59 UTC  

@Mr. Nessel I'm sick of absolutely retarded takes being presented as intellectual. First, these guys supported Yang, then Gabbard, then Bloomberg, then Bernie. All of whom are viciously anti-white and would gladly throw right-wingers in jail. I'm no fan of Trump, but he's not that bad. It's only a matter of time before they start endorsing Julius Malema in South Africa and start calling people who question them boomers. It was all a waste of time and makes the dissident right look like a joke. We need maturity.

2020-03-28 12:05:13 UTC  

Endeavour you literally said that bloomberg getting elected would be the best from bernie trump and him

2020-03-28 12:54:22 UTC  

@Imperial J. Yay I never said that. I said Bloomberg was the least horrible of the Democrats. I still said it would be better if Trump won though because Trump gives us time and the ability to hold their feet to the fire. I never said I endorsed him though. Furthermore, I'm not trying to come up with crackpot 4D chess schemes and calling everyone who disagrees with them a "boomer".

2020-03-28 12:54:57 UTC  

I might have remembered it wrong then sorry

2020-03-28 12:55:07 UTC  

iirc it was late night in the vc

2020-03-28 12:57:33 UTC  

I've said many times that, while Trump hasn't delivered on policy, him winning in 2016 was a major metapolitical victory for us because it was a big screw you to the establishment. What he represented in 2016 was temporarily useful.

2020-03-28 13:33:25 UTC  

I agree about Trump being necessary to buy time but only one of these guys endorsed Bloomberg and he didn't call other people boomer because of it
His endorsement came because he would view a Bloomberg victory not as good (like Trump supporters who "ironically" shilled for Yang and his UBI) but showing people that a billionaire establishment type literally can buy an election.
Of course I don't agree with it because I don't like gambling, however they're respectable people imo and what damage has Keith actually done considering Bloomberg didn't get the nomination as he expected