It has all sorts of negative implications and promoting it is soicidal if you want a healthy society

Are you sure you are thinking about "achievement culture" and not "tyranny of success"? A very bad way to raise children?

Yea

I don't buy into natural law but it's obvious that gayness has many downsides if embraced by society

It's better for gays even if it remains in the closet

Unseen by most people

natural law = what works
doesnt even need divinity to make sense as a concept

That is some backwards logic man.

Oh yes, that valuable and indispensable gay culture

@Fighting Gold It's more complicated than that

Otherwise I wouldn't object to it

<:thrinking:638952313167544360>

So force them to not indulge

What is the issue

🤯

<:retard:611721794621276170>

Serbian Tundra temperature iq take

Ok heretic

Autistically contrarian

And what a shitty future it is

End art then

Ok now I get what you are saying but those talented people like Mercury were successful artist not just because they didn't "indulge" (which usually isn't a case)

Caravaggio totally shagged boys

Caravaggio was just bat shit insane combined with being talented. Being gay does not play into that.

Lmao

Well, that's your subjective view.

Poopdick no maek good art

Looks bad

that's ugly af

The face is bad

But this fag artist who takes dick up the ass and is salty because society doesn’t see it that way makes excellent art

looks gay

Yeah it’s technically impressive but so were his contemporaries. Subject itself is almost postmodern in its intentional ugliness

Not everyone who is spiritually disturbed/not at peace is gay.

^

It's ugly

It is pretty ugly tho

Why are you trying to get us to like artists with HIV

@Anthony tell me - do you think the author of this was mentally disturbed or gay?

||probably||

I know gays are overrepresented amongst artists but it is mostly because homosexuality correlates with other things which make good artists, not them being gay per se or indulging in it or even being accepted