Since you don't need to house, feed and treat sharecroppers with expensive medicine

I think owning a person is bad in principle

I’d agree with freeing the slaves

And I’d gladly fight for that

Assuming they would go and nest in their own countries instead of ours

yeah

The limit for me as to what might be acceptable is well regulated, temporary serfdom

but did it do much

yeah they got free and all

but a large chunk of them remained at the bottom of the economic class

so whats really the point?

Besides slavery is just laziness imo

Why does a man need another man to do work he can do himself

IT WAS THE DEMOKKKRATS THAT HELD THEM DOWN

why not free the ones that reached a set merit in some way oranother

Unless it’s some kind of heavy lifting work

yeah

it was totally )white men( that owned slaves

In antiquity maybe it was required since everyone was engaging in it
If you didn't you did not have workers

Some historians think the reason Rome never had an industrial revolution was because of its reliance on slavery

lma

o

It's a decent hypothesis

Pretty sure slaves actually increased its economy rite

Less need to invent engines and whatnot if there's manual labour for it

So Romans were pretty good at using manual labour in treadmills

Hey dudes

I am concerned about my DNA results

It says I have a gene

Slavery is also stated as a reason why the south was less developed than the north

I mean, I can certainly see where taking slaves can be tempting

that in 60-70% of owners

leads to late onset alzheimeres

lel

Will Alzheimers be cured by the time I'm 80?

Probably

I'm 18 right now

Maybe

I'm thinking they'll be done curing aging when I'm old

Just come to terms with being mortal, like everyone else in history.

If I die so be it

@McFansy That is not my concern

No need to just accept it tho