It's probably healthy to have an area dedicated to the discussion of the ideal vs practical woman. It depends on the nature of your server - if you want lifestyle subsections dedicated to dating, finding partners, etc.
There's no real problem in posting attractive women generally it's more about the motivations or behaviors underlying the posting. Lots of people will post statues of topless males for instance because they are indicators of fortitude, etc - but presumably women and queers could find that material arousing.
If you're just being a coomer then obviously any pic of a girl no matter how chaste can be turned into jerk material but if your motivations are purer then you can accommodate a broader range of material - medical journals for example feature lots of naked females, but the emphasis of the content is professional not sexual.
To take the alternative position - that all nudity is inherently pornographic - is to indict a lot of traditional art which shows women in stages of undress, or nude children. We shouldn't reject this notion BECAUSE it taints art - that would be illogical - but rather reject the notion because we don't have any good justification to believe that historical artists were predominately pedos and perverts.
Rather its more likely that as the accessibility of art moved down into the middle/lower classes it covered more common themes, which included things like the banality of nudity - which has had to be addressed as a point of concern by modern social media companies - where kids throwing their clothes off and running around naked is a pretty ubiquitous and often humorous phenomenon.
The real issue is that if we adopt the notion that intent is primary you get those dumb mentally 9000 year old succubus anime pedos drawing kids having sex
