Message from @Galahad
Discord ID: 701162714512228442
So you're just going to assert they were going to collectivize I.G Farben and all these other industrial concerns which were already collaborating with the government
Because you need evidence for that
liberal dream is for people to have virtually no overarching goverment that unifies people
and for people to be atomised within their own heavily guarded property
too bad this already happened
the american indians had their tribal fiefdoms
heavily armed
free
not bothered by a bigger state
when they tried to unify they failed spectacularly
The state is much more efficient at developing technology,building armies,infrastructure,spreading its religion. etc
what wil inevtiably happen is that states with smaller goverments will be crushed by bigger states because they wont give a shit about your petty liberties. I still find it funny that after each world war the US goverment grew.not decreased. Its out of necessety.you cant win against enemy big states by decreasing the power of your own state.
its almost like natsoc germany was closer to the fascist model of politieconomy than to muh commies
> So you're just going to assert they were going to collectivize I.G Farben and all these other industrial concerns which were already collaborating with the government
@Mr. Nessel
Because you don't understand the difference of private and collective ownership of the means of producion
I do, you don't
too bad NATSOC germany had Jingoism as their only foreign policy
you cant win by being at constant war with the world
Regulating a buisness isn't the same as nationalizing it
best irony is the commies end up becoming the fascists due to necessity
natsoc germany went into war socialism pretty early because they had plans to expand massively
it was war after all
> I do, you don't
@Mr. Nessel
So a paper saying "you owner" and a pistol by government in the neck is private ownership then?
Hahaha
that doesnt mean they wanted to have a proletarian revolution
Commie logic 😂
@Galahad Actually the total war mobilization only started in 1942 under Speer
> Commie logic 😂
@Mr.Fisch(炫龙)#6407 I didn’t know we were reds
@Mr.Fisch(炫龙) Yes considering most of the concerns profited off of it and survived the war
LoL, again, watch the Tik vid on why Germans needed to start the war so early
they were maneuvering their economy to war socialism since the early 1930s dude
again im not putting a value judgement on it
nor do i think theyre commies
They were spending a lot on the military but not goign for total mobilization
that doesn't however change the intentions of the Nazis, they wanted to centralise everything
Guess what noone teaches in public schools
The difference between natsocs and commies is that nazis only respected private properties of native germans
commies respected nobodies private property
I wish there was a boomer emoji
centralise the economy, the people, the state, the military...ect absolutely everything
Why does every conversation about changing the status quo have to go back to WW2 for justification?
WW2 is big
I know right
Hitler was boring anyway
its the boomer truth regime
My Nazi shrine
I want borders. "You know what happened in 1945 when people wanted borders right?"
Heres an idea
Because most people are bluepilled on the socialism and capitalism dichotomy
Use lesser known fascists as to not look horribly optics wise