Message from @NotQuiteHuman
Discord ID: 463182791241105424
Even killing a rapist they have a mom
And?
I said *self defense*
so it can be justified but still bringing immoral injustice
@Deleted User I think I see where you're going. Like, putting a dog out it's misery if it's twitching in gmthe road after being hit, is moral. Compared to hitting it with a baseball bat for fun.
by pain and suffering of innocent family
like the butterful effect
I said Self defense, Grayman. What you are saying can be applied to the concept of revenge
or justice
The action itself isn't immoral nor moral; rather the intent of the perpertrator
Well, not exactly
I said context, not intent
Or the consequence?
Think about this
If there's a white supremacist walking down the road
he has a shotgun
He sees a black man raping a child in an alley
and shoots the black man
Now, a black man being shot by a white supremacist, is immoral
but, a rapist being killed to defend his victim, is moral
Exactly, considerng intent pollutes the context
The context should matter, on it's own
and that's it
Yeah, I see what you're saying
But if people disagree that randomly killing blacks with no reason is immoral, how do you square that with objective morality?
You and I might agree that unprovoked murder is immoral...
Someone else might disagree
Again, context. I think I side with objective morality more
Let's dial it back a notch
A racist man says Nigger on a stream
He says it because he's reading huckleberry Finn
holy fuck
u guys gotta watch that person son vid
Now, if you consider intent, you'd have to impose what *you* think, on that man
Your nuance is showing 🙈
"AI when it runs it doesn't have rules"
matt "ugh.. the operating system has rules"
lmfao
But if you merely consider *context*, the man did nothing wrong
Philosophers can be annoyingly collectivist at times