Also you didn't use it against it me so much as you twisted the words to fit your narrative

Which is a scummy thing to do

The only fact we know is prisoners that go into solitary in most cases are already showing symptoms of psychological illness. Everything else is just a suggestion based on limited research. Which means your assumptions are false. I win. You lose. Get over it.

Again

That is your fact

You said most

While the article said many

And not most

However, research regarding psychological effects is limited by the fact that many inmates are mentally ill prior to incarceration, making it difficult to distinguish whether psychological symptoms are directly produced by solitary confinement. (Smith, 2006

This is what you call fact

Additionally, research is limited by the settings in which the studies must be conducted. Naturalistic studies conducted in actual prisons do not have control groups (Constanzo et al., 2012; Smith, 2006), while studies using contrived settings are also limited because they cannot fully mimic the harsh conditions of prisons due to the researchers’ ethical obligations. For example, the volunteers in studies using contrived settings are confined for much shorter periods of time compared to actual inmates (Bonta & Gendreau, 1990). Thus, these findings cannot be accurately compared to the real-life experiences of prisoners (Smith, 2006

I call the entire article fact

Fake newz

This is what you call fact

And not the parts you pick to fit your narrative

And in botg cases they are not facts

Fake fucking news you bastard

Just SUGGESTIONS

Fuck off

And i explained what that phrase means in scientific terms

Which you ignored

Based on.... wait for it......

LIMITED RESEARCH

And kept repeating yourself

What limited research means is that a large sample is studied to make that limitation null

Which is how a study is done

You keep repeating yourself instead of bringing something new to the table

Which i always refute

Which you keep on ignoring

And repeating yourself

Again

And then saying i lost as a summy tactic to get the last word in

And then asking a dumb question and trying to force me into a corner to make me look like an idiot

And then repeating those quotes even though i already refuted them

I'm sorry but it seems to me that you're just being salty that your anarchist edgy world will never exist

And you're salty that people are already talking about solitary confinment

And making strides in improving things

And you keep repeating that suggestions based on limited research are facts. I get it.

Also not an anarchist. I just want rapists and murderers killed wheras you wanna babysit them. Cool story bro

Who said anything about babysitting them?

I said that solitary is not effective for the purpose it was created