I dont smoke, but I reckon that if you search hard enough, you can find something innoculous that is used to produce one of the most unhealthiest things out there.

Some are added to stabilise the the vaccine solution, some is to prevent coagulation of the ingredients inside

Makes sense, pus hardens.

Harder for it to spread in the blood stream

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-06-cdc-document-bombshell-reveals-list-of-all-vaccine-excipients-including-african-green-monkey-kidney-cells-and-fibroblast-cells-from-aborted-human-fetuses-see-the-complete-list.html

But I think they should list the ingredients and uses in that vaccine so that we can be more inform about it

Yeah, its a mix of issues here.

One, slightly informed people can be more harmful than uninformed people

Informed enough to know that mercury is in it, but not enough to know that its in there as part of a compound and is harmless in that state,

True

cant imagine anyone in their right mind to read that LONG list of ingredients and be like.... "YEP, THAT SOUNDS GOOD!"

But we pretty much turn a blind eye to almost every other things like shampoo, soap, etc

Or even the processed food we eat

I mean it makes sense, but that falls back to my statement

Half informed is worse than uninformed.

thats not as bad as injecting them directly in you... which bypasses most of the body's protective barriors that help to filter and mitigate extreme complications and reactions

And its hella hard to make sure someone is "fully informed"

And people should try harder, keeping stuff like that hidden will only arouse suspicioun

doesnt matter anyways... no means no .... the obligation is not on us to prove that we are "fully informed"

Even then, people should look at the results anyway.

Having the information available is more important, because you can't really change the lazy people

If they cant understand the chems in vaccines, they should understand the results of the vaccines.

of course, they should be encouraged to read the insert label and see all the side effects admitted to and disclaimed straight out of the horses mouth

I am sure that its a thing where the drugs advertised in the US will say helps with x and then list down dozens of potential side effects,

my position is basic.... i am pro-consumer-choice

not "anti-vaxx"

Though I think showing the ingredients alone isnt enough

Anti vac is quite ridiculous tho

I was thinking, look what we achieved, well, this is what we needed.

i am for CLEAN and thoroughly third party safety tested vaccines and stuff after all w/o all the added toxic garbage perservatives and other adjuvents

yeah, you still would not be fully informed just by scanning over the list of ingrediets without a thoroough understanding about each and every one of them.... its just not worth the risk

net overall risk over benefit for much too high of risk

thats just my opinion..... you are free to make the final decision and choices for your own healthcare procedures

Well id say trust the science, but blind faith is harmful

We seen the far left and their "science"

i do trust the science.... thats the whole idea of my side too 😉 the science of the safety studies which only lead to further concerns

Which is a hard question to be very honest.

Mainly, I stand that everything should be transparent.

But that means everyone must be informed and not lazy

In essence we all believe something because someone told us so.

We read history books. Thats us being told by a historian who looked into the matter personally.