Message from @Little Boots
Discord ID: 453842858219405334
^^^^^
But also, Wait for the real trailer and then give your opinion
That's what I do
I am pretty pumped for Rage 2 though
I'm pretty sure that the "Fallout Rust edition" thing is just hysteria.
Even if it does have Multiplayer included, they'll most likely have single-player campaigns as well.
I want it to have a more traditional single player campaign...and I want it to actually be a fucking RPG this time around
Plus that originated from Kotaku, Which has had a feud with Bethesda for years
Kotaku is drenched in soy milk
So is Polygon
Their fucking Far Cry 5 review was one paragraph after another of "WAAAH WAAAH. WHY ISN;T IT ABOUT TRUMP AND HOW GUN OWNERS ARE ALL RACIST?!"
I mean, multiplayer wouldn't be bad as long as they backed it up with more RPG choices and better characters.
Kind of have it similar to Far Cry 5's Multiplayer where you can kind of do it to have some fun with your friends or show off your settlement builds.
The dumbed down level system./ The ruined dialog system./ The radiant quests. the lack of moral choice. The lack of level cap. All of this REALLY bothered me about 4
I think they could really improve upon the dialogue system and go back with what they had in the past.
And leveling should go back to what it was like before Fallout 4, but the radiant quests were kind of there from the beginning.
3 and NV are both wonderful RPGs. I fucking love both of them
However, what could really do them a service is getting better writers on staff to write better plots.
Hire Chris Avellone
Hell, I'm willing to lend them a hand.
Though, one thing is for certain, Fallout 4 did have some good DLCs, but those could have also been better.
Especially Nuka-World.
Hire people that worked at Bioware before it turned into an Anita Sarkeesian loving cuck pit
Or just hire Obsidian to do the story and writing.
that would work too.
they will respect the lore far more than Bethesda did in 4. Fucking kid in a fridge. Go fuck yourself
Well, the lore never really specified on the extent of how Ghouls worked.
Fallout 1 made it very clear that ghouls need water
But not food.
And they could sustain themselves from radiation.
But if they do not have access to water, they die
And the water problem wouldn't be too much of a problem if there's openings for moisture to enter the fridge.
Yes it would
No, I'm more concerned about the fact that no one decided to check the fridge to see if anyone was inside...
Like, in the past two hundred years, absolutely no one bothered checking about the kid calling out from the fridge.
His parents were like...200 feet away or some stupid shit. Like...waht the fuck? They did not look for him in 200 years? No one happened by it for 200 years? Awful writing on top of the very obvious lore breaking
I'm less concerned about the possible lore-breaking issues and I'm more concerned about the logical problems with it.
After all, it's entirely possible that water could have leaked in there over time to provide some sort of moisture in there and, if it's sealed tight enough, moisture could just remain in there and be recollected.
Then again, we're talking about the same universe that the TARDIS appears, we have talking cows and death claws, and alien exist.
It's not possible to gather enough to sustain life for 200 years. It is lore breaking. Ghouls need food and water to survive
No, the lore says they only need water. Food, from what I understand, was optional.