I will point out that this is spotty territory. They may very well take some statistics out of context to prop up their claims. Anyone that has lived in America and doesnt have a particular ideological mindset will recognize this for the propoganda that it is, but many, including foreigners, might not see how damn well women are treated in the U.S.

@EnderOctanus is your conclusion factoring in conditions other than death, off hand I would predict alcohol and substance use rates and a state of intoxication being present in many domestic violence cases

@Stefan Payne are there respectable academics having public discourse that are actually making that comparison said

No sane person would make that comparisation and/or claim that US are particularly bad for journalists or women. On the contrary...

@Stefan Payne ugh...alright so, what criteria would you rank as being critical to considering when determining how to qualify dangerous? Murder/death? Stalking? Battery? Arson attempts? ?

Of course bodily harm, not just insults.
And I'd also mention that somewhere in the rating as well, how I'd rate it.

Trump calling CNN Fake News is not an act of violence.

Obama jailing "Journalists" is.

AND it has to be related to the Job and be done by other persons.

Ok good I got ya

How do you rank trump communicating that "the press is the enemy of the people" ?

So if 100 Journalists happen to be killed by thunder and falling trees, its not something that indicates the danger for journalists at all.
Yes, they died but due to bad luck or stupidity, not because their occupation.

```How do you rank trump communicating that "the press is the enemy of the people" ?```
As a true statement.

The Press has to side with the population and not Corporations or Gouvernment. When in reality they side with either political partys, Corporations but are against the People.

best example is the Pro Migration propaganda in Germany.

of wich some was written by the Fake Newser Claas....

The Press has to be at odds with the Gouvernment, but all members of gouvernment equally, not prefer someone like Killary for example. And also not lie because of something.

And the most important thing:
*NEVER EVER EVER should the Press propagate War!*
They should always be against it, ALWAYS.

I agree with a lot of that

What is it that they said that made the us supposedly risky for journalists ?

Exactly that is the question, how they came up with that shit.

Personally I'd rate UK far before the US and even Germany far in front. US of A is one of the freest country for "Journalists" right now.
Though they get fired left and right for obvious reasons (lets say they didn't listen to Tim P.)

Probably its something out of the Obama area....
You remember Obama? The one that jailed an Indian immigrant for insulting Obama...

The earlier link mentions the 5 ppl that died at that local Gazette, after a.lawsuit of some type he was pissed over

Oh yeah, totally forgot that shit show

IIRC news coverage of that is not as bad as Charlottesville but stil quite bad.

I think it was the only like, notable event

There were also a couple other deaths due to accident. Maybe they counted that as well

Ppl who have a career in publishing and broadcast news surely are being subjected to heightened attention and scrutiny. I would say

In the UD

US

No

because they are allowed to publish total lied hit pieces and misrepresent people without consequences

So they are getting higher scrutiny, or they aren't?

no, they aren't, as they are faking news and storys.

See the shitshow of Charlottesville.

What about charlottesville?

The Media lied and invented shit...

There were a couple of hard right but most people were probably not. And they hid the violence from the Antifa/Left Wing Radicals. For example the Pictures that show the Left wing thugs hitting a car that is driving towards a crowd.

That caused. The driver to escape them in he direction if the crowd?

@Stefan Payne