Message from @EnderOctanus
Discord ID: 528100936355151872
nah, it's the idiots in media as usual.
Its time for some SoC
Snow of Color
umm, like what?
how did it turn brown?
is this a political statement?
Like, did something brown touch it and then it turned brown?
Like smearing something brown against the white snow, in turn staining the snow with something brown?
and why then are we not talking about the implications of smearing something brown with white snow in racial terms?
is it that somehow we value value white snow above brown when we make a case for snow to default to a white hue?
and why would that be? - is it, that inherently, we default to white, regardless of circumstance?
because we _*prefer*_ white things over brown things?
dont tell me you are...
**colorist!**
Oh wait, I think regressives used that term before
damnit!
News, but I call it fake, i can easily rattle off many countries more dangerous than the USA.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna949676?fbclid=IwAR1EVmA60WREu0Q57kJ2eGWjQV8yi2337tXXGSeTVMu4LyBcIrLMlCITOhg&__twitter_impression=true
Yeah I saw something similar how the USA is one of the top "most dangerous countries for women"
yeah, total horse shit from radical lefties who didn't go out of town
oh, they are also in there:
https://canarymission.org/organization/Jewish%20Voice%20For%20Peace
Do y'all practice a standard to spell out in more descriptive, substantive detail regarding arguements and rebuttals ?
"More normie horse shit weak sauce"
Well. Versing yourself in formal logic is a good start.
Rattle off those those countries @4AM_critter 🐉, and more interestingly rattle off the quantity and quality of chatavteritics that your considering, along with criteria you see first to determine that
Make smart arguments that are not so attitudinal along with baron if substance
?
@Stefan Payne often shares his conclusions with us, which is what I'm here for
But with high doses of emotional response and hardly ever smart ligix
Logic
Or details
If what they claim is true then it is horseshit. America affords its citizens and residents the means with which to cope with danger. HOWEVER. It is nkt the duty of government to ensure safety. As this is impossible. Its why police are dispatched to crimes when they happen, instead of sending everyone in a less than safe area, a chaperone. Women are highly enabled when it comes to seeking justice in America, and our society condemns and demonizes those that harm them. That is what they are getting at.
Meanwhile in Lebanon, women are killed for ideological reasons.
Therefore, it is blatantly ignorant at best, and malicious at worst, to claim that America is the most unsafe country in the world for women.
Yes, exactly.
You can't compare actual fear for life with some verbal insults because you fucked something up.
I will point out that this is spotty territory. They may very well take some statistics out of context to prop up their claims. Anyone that has lived in America and doesnt have a particular ideological mindset will recognize this for the propoganda that it is, but many, including foreigners, might not see how damn well women are treated in the U.S.
@EnderOctanus is your conclusion factoring in conditions other than death, off hand I would predict alcohol and substance use rates and a state of intoxication being present in many domestic violence cases
@Stefan Payne are there respectable academics having public discourse that are actually making that comparison said
No sane person would make that comparisation and/or claim that US are particularly bad for journalists or women. On the contrary...
@Stefan Payne ugh...alright so, what criteria would you rank as being critical to considering when determining how to qualify dangerous? Murder/death? Stalking? Battery? Arson attempts? ?
Of course bodily harm, not just insults.
And I'd also mention that somewhere in the rating as well, how I'd rate it.
Trump calling CNN Fake News is not an act of violence.
Obama jailing "Journalists" is.
AND it has to be related to the Job and be done by other persons.
Ok good I got ya
How do you rank trump communicating that "the press is the enemy of the people" ?
So if 100 Journalists happen to be killed by thunder and falling trees, its not something that indicates the danger for journalists at all.
Yes, they died but due to bad luck or stupidity, not because their occupation.
```How do you rank trump communicating that "the press is the enemy of the people" ?```
As a true statement.
The Press has to side with the population and not Corporations or Gouvernment. When in reality they side with either political partys, Corporations but are against the People.
best example is the Pro Migration propaganda in Germany.
of wich some was written by the Fake Newser Claas....
The Press has to be at odds with the Gouvernment, but all members of gouvernment equally, not prefer someone like Killary for example. And also not lie because of something.