The earlier link mentions the 5 ppl that died at that local Gazette, after a.lawsuit of some type he was pissed over

Oh yeah, totally forgot that shit show

IIRC news coverage of that is not as bad as Charlottesville but stil quite bad.

I think it was the only like, notable event

There were also a couple other deaths due to accident. Maybe they counted that as well

Ppl who have a career in publishing and broadcast news surely are being subjected to heightened attention and scrutiny. I would say

In the UD

US

No

because they are allowed to publish total lied hit pieces and misrepresent people without consequences

So they are getting higher scrutiny, or they aren't?

no, they aren't, as they are faking news and storys.

See the shitshow of Charlottesville.

What about charlottesville?

The Media lied and invented shit...

There were a couple of hard right but most people were probably not. And they hid the violence from the Antifa/Left Wing Radicals. For example the Pictures that show the Left wing thugs hitting a car that is driving towards a crowd.

That caused. The driver to escape them in he direction if the crowd?

@Stefan Payne

Just imagine how you would feel when you are already afraid for your life and someone hits your car with something

and that lead to the death of a person, of wich you've never seen the body.

because some people say she wasn't very skinny.

Alright, well, what about the trial and concication of the driver?

Conviction*

Erhem

There is one massive flaw in your argument.

Trump did not call The Media the enemy of the People

he called Fake News the enemy of the people.

Which is an entirely true statement, but M5M knows that they are completely full of shit so to distract from the actual problem they just REEEEE about Trump wanting to beat up Journos

Ah, well his nuance is unmatched and attributions of fault are in turn unasailable, then. The completely full of shit broadcast networks, including sports scores and current temperature outside, yet remain scarcely named by network let alone by individual, had the judgement that virtually every utterance be dismissed as discredited

Coming to them

Umm

I am not a trumper you know.

so acting like i am defending him because I like him is insane.

The Broadcast Networks are entirely fine with Journalists getting jailed/murdered/unpersoned so long as they are the right ones.

Do you think they would utter a peep if a Democrat President would say the exact same thing Trump says about them about Fox News?

Not a fucking chance.

Would they have given a lick of shit about Kashoji if they couldn't use it to beat up Trump? Not Remotely, it would have been a 5 minute fart in the wind.

Fox news was very not cool woth Jim acosta being dismissed from press hearings...I'm not sure how you're able to so certainly conclude their sentiment in alternative realities, either. Is it possible le your at all,even just slightly wrong about them in that way ?

My answer. First the list.
Turkey 68
China 47
Egypt 25
Saudi Arabia 16
Eritrea 16
Vietnam 11
Azerbaijan 10
Iran 8
Cameroon 7
Bahrain 6
Syria 6
Those are journalist in prison according to Committee to Protect Journalists (cpj.org)

The second part. I would prefer a weighted index consisting of multiple data points, like, death, hostages, and harassment instead of only one set of parameter data point. _Reporters without Borders_ (Reporters sans frontiers) used to do this. Where all countries are listed.

My problem with the article is it written to push a narrative and the headline states, _ us added to list of most dangerous countries_ the section in the Reporters without borders is the List of Deadliest countries.

The report the article source and link to is the annual report from Reporters without borders.
The report contains three main sections. Reporters death. Reporters jailed, and reporters held hostage.