Message from @Ranko

Discord ID: 526270521445449728


2018-12-23 05:27:44 UTC  

okay so all of this and youa gree with me

2018-12-23 05:27:47 UTC  

No I dont

2018-12-23 05:27:51 UTC  

yeah, you do

2018-12-23 05:28:09 UTC  

you just said you think social media sites should have the right to regulate harmful speech

2018-12-23 05:28:20 UTC  

in fact, that's probably FURTHER than I would go

2018-12-23 05:28:24 UTC  

on their own platform

2018-12-23 05:28:47 UTC  

I want these companies to have some ability to regulate, but their ability to regulate should be limited

2018-12-23 05:28:52 UTC  

if i say some awful thing on facebook, twitter shouldn't ban me

2018-12-23 05:29:15 UTC  

My point was, people arent mad at patreon for banning for the N word

2018-12-23 05:29:28 UTC  

they are mad because they misrepresented their practices

2018-12-23 05:29:34 UTC  

Actually many free speech absolutists are

2018-12-23 05:29:35 UTC  

also they arent banning for the N word

2018-12-23 05:29:39 UTC  

quick search proves that

2018-12-23 05:29:49 UTC  

Many people think that ANY regulation of the internet or social media sites is wrong

2018-12-23 05:29:53 UTC  

I think they are a minority of the controversy

2018-12-23 05:30:11 UTC  

I think we disagree over why the issue is controversial

2018-12-23 05:30:24 UTC  

I agree that banning for using the N word is fne

2018-12-23 05:30:36 UTC  

I already recognized that the Patreon case with Sargon is iffy for some reasons, but I also explained why it is kind of justified at the same time

2018-12-23 05:30:41 UTC  

my position is nuanced

2018-12-23 05:30:59 UTC  

Justified, maybe

2018-12-23 05:31:09 UTC  

should we ban porn from internet ? children might stumble across it <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

2018-12-23 05:31:13 UTC  

If we specifically told you we wouldnt ban you for something

2018-12-23 05:31:16 UTC  

and then we did

2018-12-23 05:31:35 UTC  

It could be justified for moral reasons

2018-12-23 05:31:46 UTC  

but not justified under their stated practice

2018-12-23 05:33:06 UTC  

which is why it's kinda justified kinda not

2018-12-23 05:33:36 UTC  

Its like a cop explicitly saying to you, I wont pull you over if you speed less than 5 miles over

2018-12-23 05:33:46 UTC  

then they pull you over for doing 47 in a 45

2018-12-23 05:33:55 UTC  

Well technically you did do something "bad"

2018-12-23 05:33:59 UTC  

but he said he wouldnt

2018-12-23 05:34:11 UTC  

so they would be kinda justified and kinda not

2018-12-23 05:34:21 UTC  

why is everybody so scared of nuance?

2018-12-23 05:34:38 UTC  

Yeah im pointing out the controverys is the "unjustified" part there

2018-12-23 05:35:06 UTC  

The free speech absolutests would be the ones saying "there should be no speed limits"

2018-12-23 05:35:31 UTC  

except every time I say there is nuance, you refuse to agree with that

2018-12-23 05:35:40 UTC  

and you want to go back to arguing about it lol

2018-12-23 05:35:43 UTC  

There definitely is nuance

2018-12-23 05:35:49 UTC  

Im not saying their isnt

2018-12-23 05:35:57 UTC  

okay, good. and that's my point

2018-12-23 05:35:57 UTC  

In this case, The Cop pulled you over for doing 43 in a 45 zone and then has dispach declare the area a high risk reduced speed zone to justify it.

2018-12-23 05:37:15 UTC  

I got pulled over in a 45 in a 45 zone because I was doing 55 in a 55 zone