He shaved it a couple days ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1Qhap7NcHk

https://chrisdragon.livejournal.com/102443.html?utm_source=10yearschallenge&utm_medium=email HOLY SHIT, look at my old blog lmfao

This was from 2009

Look at my proposed policies I wrote

I was 26 at the time

-Scientology will be banned, dissolved and its cult members 'reeducated'.
oh the early days of anon

A wee too authoritarian if you ask me

The whole shooting of border hoppers is very extreme too

yeah

lots of proto-trumpism there though

That's like Communist level shit there with the border shooting

the reeducation stuff as well

Iron Curtain

Sciucaro in the comments is my best bud

The dude with the SKS

2009 was defo a simpler time

Oh that's right when Obama was elected I believe

Or was this 2008

yeah

that should be around the time barry took office

Some good proposals, some eh and some terrible in there

Less world intervention, less gun control & allowance of castle doctrine nationwide

yeah, cut welfare and it's pretty much where i was politically at the time

Because fuck these Dem states and aversion to firearms. I need to get out of here for a bit

u can also have the ppl who she confessed to to bear witness to for the defense

This VA abortion law is pure insanity

https://youtu.be/8dLQCEGYF4Q

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/201613246

4chan theorizing about Tim redpilling.

Tim is going ancap.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evictionism

Killing babies is wrong. We need free baby markets.

Yes the position I have is killing a baby is wrong

*>Applying our theory to parents and children, this means that a parent does not have the right to aggress against his children, but also that the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights. The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die.2 The law, therefore, may not properly compel the parent to feed a child or to keep it alive.3 (Again, whether or not a parent has a moral rather than a legally enforceable obligation to keep his child alive is a completely separate question.) This rule allows us to solve such vexing questions as: should a parent have the right to allow a deformed baby to die (e.g., by not feeding it)?4 The answer is of course yes, following a fortiori from the larger right to allow any baby, whether deformed or not, to die. (Though, as we shall see below, in a libertarian society the existence of a free baby market will bring such "neglect" down to a minimum.)*
https://mises.org/library/children-and-rights

@Timcast So Republican sub-committee shot down the late term abortion bill in virgina. They hold a 5-4 or 5-3 majority i think

all republicans voted to table the bill and not let it be voted on

democrats all voted against tabling the bill so it would be voted on

even after the backlash

interesting

politically right twitter is way funnier than anything ive seen in the realm of political humor

Does anyone have the bill code for the paycheck fairness act, cant seem to find it on congress.gov (on mobile)