Message from @Cody
Discord ID: 544880395171135498
a bunch of immoral disgusting shit are profitable
a judiciary system based on profit is not good
posting a vid and three links every two minutes doesn't make your position credible
People aren't going to go to a judge that is just going to decide based on who gives the most money, unless you have a state.
Private law existed in Ireland and worked very well.
Mods of this server: let's make only this channel have slowmode
And <#463068752725016579>
People like halfthink is why libertarians are a joke.
Private laws... lol. Tells a lot about libertarians spergy side (the ancap retards) that they call judges work as "just giving their opinion". Sure, consideration is required but they make the consideration based on the law. In anarchy there's no law. You could have a private judging executing someone based on ugliness of a garden gnome because **why the fuck not**. Why would you need a written law when you can have private law (i.e you just give an opinion).
You can argue that of course make it based on NAP but **dude, that's just an opinion**. You could also have anarchotyranny (in a different sense that it's understood under statehood). You'd probably have EULAs that would not only just be legally enforceable but carried out privately. Small print declaring you give their child to the land owners rape dungeon, along with all your other belongings. Why the fuck not.
halfthink already proved that a libertarian society would not defend liberty, when he said animal fuckers would be shot, despite not violating NAP.
I said earlier, it's pretty simple
If you dont surprise me, I will kill you
Killing is not illegal
So... killing in general not a violation of NAP?
This is why ancaps are practically falling to the deep side of the pool... from two different sides, simultaneously.
NAP
Dont know what that is tbh
That's it. Simple stuff
speaking tough like that is ridiculous, i get second hand cringe
Not first hand?
if we ever devolve into a anarchist hellhole, i'll become a gravedigger, there'll be no shortage of corpses
Yeah. All the ancaps really want is summarily execute other people for whatever they come up with. Some seem to limit it to NAP violations (threat to life, health or property), others would execute perverts as well for crimes against morality (no NAP violation involved).
How is pedophilia not a violation of the NAP?
I don't agree with the objectivity of morality, but clearly rape would violate the principle.
sherif complex, making yourself judge jury and executioner on the spot
I think yall are just too busy licking uncles Tom's big toe to understand
He has tricked you so well, he actually made you think you need him
@halfthink You halfthink again. Weren't you going to execute pedophiles and people who has partaken in beastiality?
You do know animals don't take part in NAP considerations?
"the jews" here we go
The question earlier was about someone raping their kid.
Well, idk about other jews but I definitely dont rape or want to rape children
Asshole
Also, you do know pedophilia itself is just a thought crime, and child rape is an action that A) not all pedophiles do, and B) is done by non-pedophiles as well?
Wtf is your point?
Are you defending pedophiles?