Message from @Ranko
Discord ID: 544866439815757890
With a bullet.
so let's say there's a mom raping her son, you kill the mom, now what ? you let the boy rot ?
Adoption market.
seems reductive, who are you to decide if a bullet is the right thing to do ?
I am.
what if the husband then comes and kills you because you murdered his wife, is he right, wrong ?
If he knew that was going on and did nothing, he gets the bullet too.
bird brain
x does bad thing, me kill x durr
Would you not be willing to kill a pedo or pay for a police service that woulf enforce that in your community?
depends what the situation is and no killing would not be the first thing on my list
not the second or third, i'm not a savage
Would you at least want the child removed from the abusive relationship and the abisive parent physically removed from society?
we'd need the child temporarily removed and a fair and neutral investigation done, then some sort of trial with fair and universal rules enforced and some sort of adequate punishment..
you know, like a judicial system backed by a state or something
There's no reason those services couldn't be provided by the market, no need for slavery.
yes there is, because corporations would not follow what's just but what's profitable
that's how you get witch hunts
Market forces in a free market in law and defense woulf create a tendency toward property rights being pretty much the only rights protected. What is just is what is profitable, except where a state os involved.
grooming gangs are profitable
a bunch of immoral disgusting shit are profitable
a judiciary system based on profit is not good
posting a vid and three links every two minutes doesn't make your position credible
People aren't going to go to a judge that is just going to decide based on who gives the most money, unless you have a state.
Private law existed in Ireland and worked very well.
Mods of this server: let's make only this channel have slowmode
And <#463068752725016579>
People like halfthink is why libertarians are a joke.
Private laws... lol. Tells a lot about libertarians spergy side (the ancap retards) that they call judges work as "just giving their opinion". Sure, consideration is required but they make the consideration based on the law. In anarchy there's no law. You could have a private judging executing someone based on ugliness of a garden gnome because **why the fuck not**. Why would you need a written law when you can have private law (i.e you just give an opinion).
You can argue that of course make it based on NAP but **dude, that's just an opinion**. You could also have anarchotyranny (in a different sense that it's understood under statehood). You'd probably have EULAs that would not only just be legally enforceable but carried out privately. Small print declaring you give their child to the land owners rape dungeon, along with all your other belongings. Why the fuck not.
halfthink already proved that a libertarian society would not defend liberty, when he said animal fuckers would be shot, despite not violating NAP.
I said earlier, it's pretty simple
If you dont surprise me, I will kill you
Killing is not illegal
So... killing in general not a violation of NAP?
This is why ancaps are practically falling to the deep side of the pool... from two different sides, simultaneously.
NAP