Message from @whiic
Discord ID: 546167505639702550
It's always the same: they never kick out Antifa types from their demonstrations, but they like to cry when they get water cannon from the police.
The same plan has penalty sections for taking money out of the country, apple and microsoft each got hit with 8-13 billion in penalties.
Is this offesive?
To black people here
In the US
Why would it be?
I don't know. People are like
"This is so ugly. We should change it"
I don't think blacks care, but niggers might.
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
There's a difference between blacks and niggers, and I want to remind of it as often as possible.
@halfthink Since you are an ancap retard, comment on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS1jsgyrEXk
Address the problem instead of responding with stock imagery.
If you respond with stock imagery, you admit everything correct, and just claim that the alternative is worse (without giving specific examples).
That's just forfeit.
He's comparing an extremely unlikely worst case scenario against an unrealistic ideal that has never existed. Like using a lack of "perfect competition" as a justification for government intervention. Does he think poor and rich communities have equal quality protection of property rights now?
I'm pretty sure such "extremely unlikely" scenario already exists in Chicago and Detroit. Also, pointing to unequal protection in current system to make things even worse is rather a splendid cop-out.
Cicago and Detroit are the opposite of an argument against ancapistan.
I'd also like to call out the hypocrisy of calling non-anarchism for demanding perfection, when the ancap side demands 0% taxes or it's theft and tyranny.
Imagine the hypocrisy of demanding 0% taxation, or everything is statism and totalitarian socialism...
Meanwhile, in that uncomfortable reality the non-ancaps don't actually demand perfection (like you claim they do). They just want to avoid a total disaster.
It's the monopoly that is the problem, not how much the government charges for its "product".
...meanwhile you argue against anti-monopoly measure. Irony.
This is why ancaps are a joke.
Sure, and free trade agreements are about free trade.
I think I'll rest my case since you haven't addressed any of the points presented, only quoted go-to arguments, which only ancaps and communists have at hand to give **regardless** of the topic at hand.
You are autistic ultimates, logical absolutes of you own positions.
Neither of you accept any reality check. Both of you say: true X has never been tried.
Ireland was basically ancap for 2000 years.
The "dark ages" were a fairly close approximation too.
So, you are actually using the Dark Age feudalism as "positive" example of anarchocapitalism. **IMAGINE MY SHOCK!**
Seriously, fuck you. Even communists have better ethics than you.
They are naive and deluded but they are not sociopaths.
Why am I suspicious that you are actually a communist making the *worst* imaginable arguments for anarchocapitalism?
<:NPC:500042527231967262>