I still don't understand why @Timcast thinks why Democratic establishment needs to be replaced with people like AOC, when he still goes to support policies that Crowley would likely have supported. It's funny.

Also, while 3 billion tax break is not automatically lost money (since losing Amazon HQ may cause 10 billion in lost revenue), it's still unjust favoritism for **ONE** company which is not given to other companies.

Even as center-right / centrist libertarian type, I cannot support corporate favoritism even if it produces result. It's corrupt as fuck.

There is an argument to be made that corruption does produce wealth, but if so, why not support the *establishment*? They are **masters** in corruption, thus the best ones to uphold it!

Seems like Tim wants to have the cake and eat it too... which is typical leftist.

Why can't we make a system that results in corruption costing more than paying taxes?

@halfthink Lies. The libertarian left in reality don't denounce the commies.

"Stalin was right wing"

Yeah. **Exactly** that nonsense. They blame any attempts at communism to be rightwing, and continue to support "anarcho"commies.

As i understand it the bonuses granted to amazon via the tax plan are rewards for keeping the money inside of the US as opposed to sending it overseas.

Like Tim has admitted: left support diversity of tactics. They can have a peaceful protest but they don't separate themselves from "separate" black block tactics.

It's always the same: they never kick out Antifa types from their demonstrations, but they like to cry when they get water cannon from the police.

https://youtu.be/Z21Lu2QiruY

The same plan has penalty sections for taking money out of the country, apple and microsoft each got hit with 8-13 billion in penalties.

Is this offesive?

To black people here

In the US

Why would it be?

I don't know. People are like
"This is so ugly. We should change it"

I don't think blacks care, but niggers might.

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

There's a difference between blacks and niggers, and I want to remind of it as often as possible.

@halfthink Since you are an ancap retard, comment on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS1jsgyrEXk

Address the problem instead of responding with stock imagery.

If you respond with stock imagery, you admit everything correct, and just claim that the alternative is worse (without giving specific examples).

That's just forfeit.

He's comparing an extremely unlikely worst case scenario against an unrealistic ideal that has never existed. Like using a lack of "perfect competition" as a justification for government intervention. Does he think poor and rich communities have equal quality protection of property rights now?

I'm pretty sure such "extremely unlikely" scenario already exists in Chicago and Detroit. Also, pointing to unequal protection in current system to make things even worse is rather a splendid cop-out.

Cicago and Detroit are the opposite of an argument against ancapistan.

I'd also like to call out the hypocrisy of calling non-anarchism for demanding perfection, when the ancap side demands 0% taxes or it's theft and tyranny.

Imagine the hypocrisy of demanding 0% taxation, or everything is statism and totalitarian socialism...

Meanwhile, in that uncomfortable reality the non-ancaps don't actually demand perfection (like you claim they do). They just want to avoid a total disaster.

It's the monopoly that is the problem, not how much the government charges for its "product".

...meanwhile you argue against anti-monopoly measure. Irony.

This is why ancaps are a joke.

Sure, and free trade agreements are about free trade.

I think I'll rest my case since you haven't addressed any of the points presented, only quoted go-to arguments, which only ancaps and communists have at hand to give **regardless** of the topic at hand.

You are autistic ultimates, logical absolutes of you own positions.