correct, non linear math

but I'm not talking about theoreticals

I'm talking about how 2 + 2 = 5 is logically inconsistent

@RidleyChozo ah, more photos to further illustrate my point

"it looks flat, so it MUST be flat"

@RidleyChozo you can see further away because of the observer's perspective.

thanks for proving how well the curvature equation works in reality

so therefore atoms do not exist, is your argument

"I do not experience it, therefore it does not exist"

you say you cannot match reality with your experiences

so therefore, "if i cannot perceive it, then it's false"

"You cannot match your reality with your experiences."

that's not what you said

@Derek Nelson that's a pre-supposition

you don't perceive 70 mph in your car either

no you don't

you only perceive acceleration

conservation of momentum

no I don't, because we can measure BEYOND our own naked eye observations

yes you can.

We can measure 10 miles

you cannot look and say "that is 10 miles" with only your naked eyes

No, Nomad

you can't perceive distance on your own

you cannot perceive time on your own

I'm using it as a connection because conservation of momentum applies in both scenarios

you can only perceive acceleration, not constant velocity

whether in a car or on a spinning ball

it does whip back yes

but then you would be perceiving wind force

and not the velocity itself

at no point in time, does ANYTHING ever perceive a constant velocity, apart from measurement tools

Millimeters exist

but you cannot say "that is exactly 15 millimeters"

without measurement tools

correct

so therefore, you yourself cannot experience distance

or perceive it

@Derek Nelson I just explained this to you....

You can't perceive it because we cannot perceive constant velocity

you can't Derek

it's not a belief, it's a law of physics

so you use measurements, nomad

can you possibly perceive distance without using a measurement?

ok, so your answer is no.

how dare you be arrogant enough to say "I do not experience it, therefore it is false"?

"You cannot match your reality with your experiences."

yes

you did

it doesn't have to be a question

that's a statement you made

"You cannot match your reality with your experiences."

so you asserted that "I cannot experience it, therefore it cannot match reality"

it's not a presumption

that's literally what you're asserting

"The Earth is flat, because I cannot experience a curve. If I cannot experience a curve, then it does not match reality"

but that's the argument you've been making this whole time

showing pictures of a "flat plane"

"water always finds its level"

"it looks flat, so it MUST be flat"

heyo

single cell organisms are much more survivable than humans

for sure

100% certainty does not exist.

therefore it's irrelevant to make an argument from ignorance

@A_buff is trolling in vc, plz mute

heyo

we're in VC if anyone's interested

^

the sun generates light

but the sun itself is not light

^

I'm not sure how the bible itself proves a flat earth

we're in VC bois

waiting for human sheeple to get on

so i can deb8 him again

Morning Dew, wanna come on VC?

Wouldn't you literally just be a fish in a fishbowl at that point?

air is our water

or maybe

we're turtles inside someone's glass enclosure

the point is, we're pets to someone else for their pleasure

wouldn't that make me super insignificant?

If he wanted to bless me, he would have given me outer space

....yes.

why else would they create an enclosure?

god I think?

we're not a class 0

we're like a class 0.8

Also, working together does not exactly produce more electricity right? I mean, we measure energy throughout the entire world for that measurement, whether we're working together or not

and no, it's not close enough. We're way closer to a class 1 than we are a class 0

well yeah, of course it would be

bruh

vc is always so ded

this sucks

lol

2 minutes in VC and got muted

@Human Sheeple would you kindly stop muting?

for one who touts about government conspiracy

there you're unmuted